QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Dr. Jianfa Bai, a Professor at Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench.
CLC is the most used software we have, and we have been using it for some time.
Based on a response of 9 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Andrew Camilli, a Principal Investigator at Tufts University, would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench.
We have used CLC Genomics and Main Workbench for years and have loved it.
Very user-friendly and powerful software.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A University professor would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench for this reason:
The Workbench provides all you need for daily work, and can be expanded to do more.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Huiquan Liu, a Professor at Northwest A&F University, would be likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
CLC Genomics Workbench is easy-to-use and powerful.
Based on a response of 8 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Chief Scientist at an educational institution would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
User friendly, relatively transparent pipeline. Excellent customer support and good interaction.
Based on a response of 9 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Technician at a federal government agency would be likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
The visualization aspects of the products I have used are great. There is also ease of use. The analysis methods seem to be up-to-date and robust.
Based on a response of 8 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A university professor at an educational institution would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics.
Great customer service and very prompt communications.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Review
5/5 Stars
I’ve learned, slowly and painfully, how to do bioinformatic analysis on the command line. I love how simple CLC is to use, and when other labs wish to just do the analysis without the crazy learning curve of Unix, I recommend they buy CLC.
My only suggestion is to explain in the tutorials/manuals what the effects of each option are. For example, why would you want a BLAST word size of 3 for protein but 6 for nucleotide? What is the effect of global vs local alignment when mapping reads (I know these are defined, but most folks don’t understand how that applies to their situation). There are many many cases where I get to an option and have no idea how to know which is best for me.
Full Disclosure: I haven’t read the manual in a few years, you may have already dealt with this :)
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Ammar Husami from Children’s Hospital Medical Center would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench:
I can go from data to results to insights in minutes. I can also share the results.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Review
5/5 Stars
Our main focus is on hereditary eye diseases and breast cancer.
We generate our data via customized Agilent SureSelect target region enrichment and sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform. After generating .fastqs, the whole process of quality trimming, alignment, annotation etc. runs through tailor-made Workbench workflows.
We also have implemented ANNOVAR in our Workflows and use the Copy Number Variant Detection tool as part of our data analyis.
We would definetely recommed the CLC Workbench for beginners and experienced users.
The commencement for beginners is challenging because of all the features and settings, but it is really worth. You can rely on a friendly and helpful customer support and a detailed and intuitive documenation within the software.
We are very satisfied because of the flexibility, the open architecture and the expandability. While other software tools hide their processes of creating the desired data, the CLC Workbench provides high transparency and the ability of setting the parameters by our own. So you can tune-up your workflows quickly until you are happy with the quality of your final data.
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Staff Scientist at a commercial food production company would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench.
Works perfectly for the applications I need. Customer service has been easy to access and always helpful!
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Christoph Meier, a bioinformatician at University of Regensburg, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics.
High flexibility, a sandbox-like system with many optional extensions; good and fast customer service too.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A University research technician would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
I like that the GUI offers a low barrier to entry for those starting out in sequence analysis.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Agnelo Furtado, Postdoctoral Fellow at University of Queensland, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics.
A good suite of programs. Very very very good support. Very professional company. Most of our students are biologists and do not know much about the command line.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Martie Verschuren, a scientist at Avans University of Applied Sciences, would be likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench.
We use CLC in our university of applied sciences, and we are very happy with this package.
Based on a response of 8 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Dr. Mohit Swarnkar, Research Manager at CSIR-IHBT, would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench.
I am one of the old users of QIAGEN Bioinformatics and have been truly impressed using their products for analyzing big data in simplest way. I have been using CLC Genomics Workbench, I am fond of their tools with graphical interfaces.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Bioinformatician at a small business computer software company would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench.
I’ve used CLC Genomics Workbench for a number of years and it works great for my research. I’ve also had a great experience with QIAGEN Bioinformatics Support.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Ali Karanfil, a Research Assistant at Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench.
Because it is very useful and simple. It gives me all I need.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Review
5/5 Stars
Excellence and easy to use software for less experienced scientist who wants to do NGS analysis without learning command line. Tutorial materials are very good examples to learn how to analyze the data by CLC.
Yes, I will. For most scientists who have less background using command line, commercial software is an easy and quick way to start/establish a NGS experiment in the laboratory.
