QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Statistic
63% of surveyed organizations not aware of any regulations that will require them to interpret somatic NGS data from tumor samples in their country.
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
David Dyer, a Professor at University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
Primarily due to my experience with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis; secondarily, due to our core facility use of CLC Genomics Workbench.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Massar Dieng, a Laboratory Manager at New York University Abu Dhabi, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
Very user-friendly. No need for bioinformatics skills.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Sriram Balusu, a Post Doctoral Researcher at KU Leuven, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
its easy and intuitive. Even a person with no bioinformatics can use it with 30 minutes introduction.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Jezreel Pantaleon Garcia, a Postdoctoral Fellow at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
Because there are so many results and insights that you can get from using their Bioinformatic tools in a single place.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Review
4/5 Stars
We’re currently using ‘Ingenuity’ and ‘HGMD’ to find pathogenic variants after NGS analysis. The filtering function and literature search are very convenient for us because it takes less time than just searching Pubmed. ACMG guidelines evaluation results are useful too.
Yes. Easy to use and good overall.
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Review
5/5 Stars
I’m satisfied in using HGMD as it enables quick data acquisition and mutation assesment. In particular, identification of mutations incorrectly described in the literature is enhanced, making the HGMD unique and very helful.
Yes, I would, as I have used it for several years and I’m very satisfied to have it as an external, curated database.
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Review
5/5 Stars
I regularly use IPA’s canonical pathway enrichment, upstream regulator, and causal network analysis with both bulk and single cell RNA-Seq data. It’s absolutely awesome since I typically work with data from a wide range of immune cell types.
I definitely recommend your software since it’s very practical to use and provides in-depth analysis of genomic data using manually curated biological findings from the literature.
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Postdoctoral Fellow at an educational institution would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
I am a very big fan of IPA Software.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Principal Investigator at an educational institution would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
IPA is a fantastic tool.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Research Assistant at a large enterprise pharmaceuticals company would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
My project would not have been possible without Ingenuity Pathway Analysis.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Sanjay Awasthi, a Medical oncologist & Principal Investigator at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
Excellent and medically relevant.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Professor at an educational institution would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
State of the art software.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Staff Scientist at a small business health care company would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
IPA is unique in its capabilities to analyze RNAseq data and Metabolomics
Based on a response of 9 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Kaitlin Skyrypek, a Graduate Student at The University of Southern California, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
Extremely useful for anyone in the research field and easy/fun to explore!
Based on a response of 9 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Post Doctoral Researcher at a large enterprise health care company would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
I am using IPA software. One of the strong points of this software is that even a researcher working in a wet lab, like me, can handle it without any difficulties.
Based on a response of 9 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Core Researcher at a non-profit would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
IPA is a great product, constantly improved and further developed.
Based on a response of 9 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Arvind Kumar, a Principal Investigator at Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
I have been using IPA for more than a decade and it has helped me move my understanding of biology and discovery research rapidly. It is user friendly and quite good with the most updated info.
Based on a response of 9 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Core Researcher at an educational institution would be likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
Good interface. Good science.
Based on a response of 8 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Senior Researcher at a Global 500 pharmaceuticals company would be likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
Powerful suite of tools and data with some best-in-class features.
Based on a response of 7 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Review
4.5/5 Stars
Hereditary cancer panel reporting in five minutes is very impressive.
I advise. It’s fast, efficient, user-friendly, and accessible from anywhere.
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Tanel Punga, an Associate Professor at Upsala University, would be likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
CLC Bio Genomics Workbench is great!
Based on a response of 8 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Karsten Liere, a Postdoctoral Fellow at Humboldt University, would be likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
CLC Genomics Workbench is good, and empowers even non-informaticians to do complex bioinformatics.
Based on a response of 8 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Professor Sassan Asgaria at University of Queensland, would be likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
We use CLC packages and are very happy with them. The Genomics Workbench provides an easy to use, windows-style platform for deep sequencing data analysis that doesn’t require learning to write scripts, and can be learned very quickly.
Based on a response of 8 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Gena Tribble, Associate Professor at University of Texas, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
It combines ease of use with advanced analysis capabilities and it works on multiple operating systems.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”