Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) Customer Testimonial
Our work utilizes single nuclei transcriptomics and IPA has helped provide downstream analyses of differential expressed genes, allowing us to identify cell type-specific changes in function.
— Ben Reiner, Principal Investigator, The University of Pennsylvania
CLC Customer Testimonial
During the first appearance of the COVID-19 pandemic, we were invited to use the CLC Tools for free. This opportunity allowed us to screen COVID-19 patients for co-infections – which we were finally able to publish https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-18854-2
— Ronny Nienhold, Lab Director, Kantonsspital Baselland
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) Customer Testimonial
IPA’s impact on my work is huge because it provides me with a reliable database to evaluate my results. Particularly, the molecule activity predictor is a kind of gold standard to test causality.
— Post Doctoral Researcher, Educational Institution
QIAGEN Digital Insights Customer Testimonial
Having access to QIAGEN OmicSoft Studio and IPA allows us to continue to operate with a single bioinformatician (myself) instead of increasing staff to maintain our own data stores. In addition to the datasets, the DNA-Seq and RNA-Seq processing tools are invaluable; having to set up and maintain my own pipelines single-handedly would be a major productivity drain.
— Research Director, Small Business Pharmaceuticals Company
OmicSoft Land Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Bioinformaticist at a large enterprise pharmaceuticals company would be very likely to recommend OmicSoft Land for this reason:
Lands are the best way for biologists and translational scientists to rapidly check out their ideas, be inspired with new ones, and then get back to the bench and prove them.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend OmicSoft Land?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Dr. Manal Natto at Glasgow University would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench:
It is very useful to use CLC to analyze our data. We have purchased multiple licenses for CLC Genomics Workbench for everyone in my group. We really can say CLC from QIAGEN is the BEST.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Senior Researcher at South Africa’s National Institute for Communicable Diseases would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench.
Excellent tool and turnaround times on queries.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Dr. Joachim Schnabl at University of Zurich would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench:
CLC workbench is great!
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Dr. Hartmut Kleinert, a Principal Investigator at Johannes Gutenberg-Universit, would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench for this reason:
Very useful for NGS analyses. Mostly very simple to use.
Based on a response of 9 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Dr. Robert Kauffman, a Staff Scientist at Emory University, would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench for this reason:
Easy to organize. All analysis in one window. Network license and database storage that is stable.
Based on a response of 9 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Dr. Ioannis loukas, an Associate Professor at the University of Athens NeoNatal Screening Laboratory (NeoScreen), would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench for this reason:
Many protocols in one platform.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Christoph Meier, a bioinformatician at University of Regensburg, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
Very flexible and very perfomant programme. Sand-box-like configuration. Good customer service.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Dr. Basil Britto Xavier, a Senior Researcher at University Antwerp, would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench for this reason:
Because it will save researchers focus on their scientific questions rather than wasting their time installing tools and searching for their dependencies. Also, in general, all QIAGEN tools designed focused on biologist, medical scientist and clinicians in mind.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Dr. Cristian Gallardo-Escárate, a Professor at Interdisciplinary Center for Aquaculture Research (INCAR), would be very likely to recommend CLC Genomics Workbench for this reason:
The best software ever.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
Lysangela Alves, a Principal Investigator at Fiocruz Paraná, would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
CLC is a very user friendly software.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
QIAGEN Bioinformatics Customer Satisfaction Rating
A Postdoctoral Fellow at an educational institution would be very likely to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics for this reason:
I have used CLC for the last 15 years. User-friendly, the Help function is very good, analysis is explained very well, user-friendly tools and navigation. Overall it is very good.
Based on a response of 10 to the question “On a scale of 0-10, how likely would you be to recommend QIAGEN Bioinformatics?”
