TechValidate Research on Ranorex

177 Case Studies – Page 3 of 6


Ranorex Case Study

Kbc Advanced Technologies Plc

Introduction

This case study of KBC Advanced Technologies plc is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: major challenges
    • Staffing: minor challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: major challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: major challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: major challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: major challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • Price point of the product
    • Price point of the product per user
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Java
    • Desktop – C/C++
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Desktop – WPF
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 25% automated, 75% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Database
    • Functional UI
    • Integration
    • Performance
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: slightly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: slightly agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly disagree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: slightly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: average
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Chemicals Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise chemicals company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“It’s easy to use!”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Relationship and communication with the Account Manager and Sales Engineer
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • SAP
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 25% automated, 75% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: strongly agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly disagree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: strongly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: strongly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Automotive & Transport Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise automotive & transport company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“The framework being built out already saves time, easy to teach people. We love the ease of use, its ability to test mobile, etc.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: no challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Mobile – web app in mobile browser
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 25% automated, 75% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests
    • Smoke

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly disagree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: superior
    • Code editor: superior
    • Cross platform testing: average
    • Cross browser testing: superior
    • Remote testing: superior
    • Integrations with test management solutions: superior

Ranorex Case Study

Meter Group

Introduction

This case study of METER Group is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Record and playback allow me to get tests up and running quickly. All in all, Ranorex Studio efficiently solves my problems.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Mobile – native Android app
    • Mobile – native iOS app
    • Desktop – Python
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 75% automated, 25% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests
    • Smoke

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: superior
    • Code editor: superior

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business computer software company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Speed, test modularity, easy to create a test suite for specific requirements.”

“Great user experience, easy to use for beginners.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: major challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: major challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: major challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Price point of the product
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 75% automated, 25% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests
    • Smoke

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: superior
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: superior
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: superior

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Aerospace & Defense Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise aerospace & defense company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“I use Ranorex quite a bit to automate repetitive tasks for other departments; has definitely helped those departments and, also, how they think of IT in general.”

“I have found Ranorex to be a great automation tool, both for UI Testing and for back-end (database) testing and tasks. There are so many automation tools available and, having used a few, I feel that Ranorex is very strong in terms of usability and adaptability.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: no challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: no challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • Price point of the product
    • Ease of use; ability to use C#
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Winforms
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 25% automated, 75% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Database
    • Functional UI
    • Integration

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: slightly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: slightly agree
    • Increased revenue: disagree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: disagree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: slightly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly disagree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: average
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Qa Work GmbH

Introduction

This case study of QA Work GmbH is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Stable and modern technology, easy to use!”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • Staffing: minor challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • Price point of the product
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – Java
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Desktop – WPF
    • Desktop – PHP
    • Mobile – native Android app
    • Mobile – native iOS app
    • Mobile – web app in mobile browser
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 50% automated, 50% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Performance
    • Regression tests
    • Visual regression
    • Smoke

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: superior
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: below average

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Insurance Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise insurance company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Support for multiple applications enables comprehensive testing across all system environments.”

“Excellent product which adds real value to the testing environment.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Test reporting: major challenges
    • Staffing: minor challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: minor challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: minor challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: major challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 75% automated, 25% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Performance
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Satec Ltd.

Introduction

This case study of SATEC Ltd. is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Power test flow-oriented flexible framework, strongly based on full C# IDE. Easy integration with open-source shareware. Integration with many test management and reporting tools. Well documented, vast knowledge sharing, and openness to user opinion. All this allowed us to replace manual work with automated and even perform tests that are impossible to perform manually. We improved dramatically our reporting.”

“Proper for a vast range of applications. For example, I’m using it both for GUI automation and RealTime features without GUI and for calculation algorithms and data analysis.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: major challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • RT devices, data acquisition and analysis
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 25% automated, 75% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Performance
    • Regression tests
    • Smoke
    • Data acquisition and analysis

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement on how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: strongly agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: strongly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: average
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: average
    • Code editor: superior
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Cristian B

Introduction

This case study of Cristian B is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: no challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: no challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – WPF
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 40% automated, 60% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Functional UI
    • Integration
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: slightly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: disagree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: disagree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: average
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: average
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: superior
    • Cross browser testing: superior
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Pharmaceuticals Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise pharmaceuticals company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Very good UI automation tool and regression test suite creation.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • test coverage: average challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • Price point of the product per user
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Mobile – web app in mobile browser
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 50% automated, 50% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests
    • Smoke

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: slightly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Automotive & Transport Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise automotive & transport company is based on a July 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“I like how it is usable for both the coding experts and the not-so-computer-savvy.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: highly satisfied
    • Rate of improvement: highly satisfied

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: highly satisfied

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: highly satisfied
  • Their product experience:
    • Included unique features
    • Been reliable
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 21-35%
    • Increased product quality: 21-35%
    • Increased product revenue: 21-35%
    • Reduced testing costs: 21-35%
    • Reduced development time to market: 21-35%
    • Reduced manual testing: 21-35%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 21-35%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 21-35%
  • Their service experience:
    • Respectful
    • Saving time
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: highly satisfied

Ranorex Case Study

Belina

Introduction

This case study of Belina is based on a January 2024 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Ranorex has greatly improved our regression testing. We don’t have to manually go through certain tests as before.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: highly satisfied
    • rate of improvement: highly satisfied

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: delighted

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: highly satisfied
  • Their product experience:
    • Been performance enhancing
    • Enabled productivity
    • Been reliable
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 50+%
    • Increased product quality: 36-50%
    • Increased product revenue: 21-35%
    • Reduced testing costs: 50+%
    • Reduced development time to market: 21-35%
    • Reduced manual testing: 50+%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 36-50%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 21-35%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
    • Respectful
    • Caring
    • Effective
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: highly satisfied

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Chemicals Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business chemicals company is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“I think Ranorex is a good tool for UI testing. I would recommend it.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: highly satisfied
    • Rate of improvement: delighted

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: highly satisfied

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: delighted
  • Their product experience:
    • Been performance enhancing
    • Included unique features
    • Enabled productivity
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 36-50%
    • Increased product quality: 36-50%
    • Increased product revenue: 21-35%
    • Reduced testing costs: 21-35%
    • Reduced development time to market: 10-20%
    • Reduced manual testing: 50+%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 50+%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 21-35%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
    • Respectful
    • Saving time
    • Effective
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: highly satisfied

Ranorex Case Study

Hafele Uk

Introduction

This case study of Hafele UK is based on a September 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“On the catch up meeting with our customer success manager, she was very helpful as was the engineer who assisted with the technical queries that we had and answered all our questions on the call. It was very worthwhile setting time aside to do this call as I feel that everyone benefited from the understanding gained on the call.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: highly satisfied
    • Rate of improvement: highly satisfied

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: delighted

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: delighted
  • Their product experience:
    • Been performance enhancing
    • Included unique features
    • Enabled productivity
    • Been reliable
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 50+%
    • Increased product quality: 36-50%
    • Increased product revenue: 10-20%
    • Reduced testing costs: 36-50%
    • Reduced development time to market: 21-35%
    • Reduced manual testing: 50+%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 50+%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 50+%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
    • Respectful
    • Caring
    • Saving time
    • Effective
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: almost satisfied

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Automotive & Transport Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise automotive & transport company is based on an August 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: highly satisfied
    • Rate of improvement: highly satisfied

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: highly satisfied

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: highly satisfied
  • Their product experience:
    • Been performance enhancing
    • Enabled productivity
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 50+%
    • Increased product quality: 50+%
    • Increased product revenue: 21-35%
    • Reduced testing costs: 36-50%
    • Reduced development time to market: 36-50%
    • Reduced manual testing: 36-50%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 50+%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 36-50%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
    • Respectful
    • Caring
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: highly satisfied

Ranorex Case Study

Large Enterprise Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a large enterprise computer software company is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“If you want to automate the test of a desktop application, I recommend Ranorex.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: highly satisfied
    • Rate of improvement: highly satisfied

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: highly satisfied

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: highly satisfied
  • Their product experience:
    • Included unique features
    • Enabled productivity
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 10-20%
    • Increased product quality: 10-20%
    • Increased product revenue: 10-20%
    • Reduced testing costs: 21-35%
    • Reduced development time to market: 10-20%
    • Reduced manual testing: 21-35%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 10-20%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 10-20%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: highly satisfied

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Government Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise government company is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“The greatest added value currently lies in the greatly reduced turnaround times for regression tests for product updates. This is because new test cases can be added easily and the test sets can be executed quickly and recurrently.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • The price point of the product
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: minor challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: minor challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: slightly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: strongly agree
    • Improved product quality: strongly agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: the same amount
    • Web: more
    • Safari: less
    • Chrome: the same amount
    • Edge: more
    • Firefox: the same amount
    • Android: the same amount
    • iOS: the same amount
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • Functional UI tests
    • Integration tests
    • Performance tests
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Java
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Desktop – JavaScript.Node.js
    • Desktop – PHP
    • Mobile – web app in mobile browser

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: average
    • Remote testing: better
    • iIntegrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Pharmaceuticals Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise pharmaceuticals company is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We like the ability to have a regression test suite to validate that existing functionality is not broken in a release. "

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

“One of our major issues is having Ranorex support new mobile OSs as they are delivered and not months after they are made public. This is why I rated them an 8 and not a 10.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Their relationship and communication with the Account Manager and Sales Engineer
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • The price point of the product
    • The price point of the product per user
    • The premium support option
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: major challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
    • Improved product quality: strongly agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web: more
    • Chrome: more
    • Edge: more
    • Firefox: more
    • Android: more
    • iOS: more
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • End-to-end tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API tests
    • Smoke tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Mobile – native Android app
    • Mobile – native iOS app

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Otp Banka

Introduction

This case study of OTP Banka is based on a November 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Speed testing — Ranorex Studio can replace a lot of manual testers.”

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

“Whenever we implemented some tests with Ranorex it helped us a lot. We integrated with the Spira team and it is the best when you click and the test cases are done.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • The premium support option
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: minor challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: major challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: minor challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
    • Improved product quality: strongly agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: more
    • Web: more
    • Safari: more
    • Chrome: more
    • Edge: more
    • Firefox: more
    • Android: the same amount
    • iOS: the same amount
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • Database tests
    • End-to-end tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Regression tests
    • Smoke tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Delphi

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Insurance Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise insurance company is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Love the ability to develop whatever I want because of Microsoft .NET Framework options.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The price point of the product
    • The price point of the product per user
    • Microsoft .Net Application with high technology stack
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: no challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: disagree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: disagree
    • Shortened release cycles: disagree
    • Improved product quality: slightly agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: the same amount
    • Web: the same amount
    • Safari: less
    • Chrome: more
    • Edge: less
    • Firefox: less
    • Android: the same amount
    • iOS: less
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • End-to-end tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Performance tests
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API tests
    • Smoke tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Java
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Desktop – C/C++
    • Desktop – JavaScript.Node.js
    • SAP, Putty, Java Swing, Windows Forms, QT Framework, Vue Framework, Angular JS, JavaFX,

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: average
    • Code editor: superior
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: average
    • Integrations with test management solutions: below average

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise computer software company is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Recording capabilities and their accuracy are helpful. Less manual testing and less product knowledge to resolve issues if the recording works properly.”

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: no challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
    • Improved product quality: agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: the same amount
    • Web: more
    • Chrome: more
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • Database tests
    • End-to-end tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Performance tests
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API tests
    • Smoke tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Winforms

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Aexis Medcal Lanka (Pvt) Ltd

Introduction

This case study of Aexis Medcal Lanka (Pvt) Ltd is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“We appreciate the support for BDD because we use the BDD approach in QA.”

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

“Love the ease of configuration and use!”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • The price point of the product
    • The price point of the product per user
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: minor challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
    • Improved product quality: strongly agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: the same amount
    • Web: more
    • Safari: less
    • Chrome: more
    • Edge: less
    • Firefox: more
    • Android: less
    • iOS: less
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • Database tests
    • End-to-end tests
    • BDD tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Integration tests
    • Performance tests
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API tests
    • Smoke tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – Java

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: superior
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Federal Government

Introduction

This case study of a federal government is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled organization asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We appreciate the Android testing on physical devices via USB without any centralized management for connections.”

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

“My recommendation would depend on the needs and requirements of the colleague, but we have found that Ranorex does cover a lot of technologies for a single product offering.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled organization to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • The price point of the product
    • Offline Capabilities for License Mgmt, Browser & Android testing
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Staffing: major challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: major challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed organization uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: slightly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: strongly agree
    • Improved product quality: strongly agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: the same amount
    • Web: more
    • Safari: less
    • Chrome: more
    • Edge: less
    • Firefox: the same amount
    • Android: more
    • iOS: less
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • Database tests
    • BDD tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Integration tests
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Java
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Desktop – WPF
    • Mobile – native Android app
    • REST API

Results

The surveyed organization achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Enclara Pharmacia

Introduction

This case study of Enclara Pharmacia is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Ranorex Spy makes it easy to catch and adjust repo items. The platform also reduces our workload.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Their relationship and communication with the Account Manager and Sales Engineer
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: no challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: no challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: strongly agree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: strongly agree
    • Improved product quality: strongly agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: the same amount
    • Web: more
    • Safari: the same amount
    • Edge: the same amount
    • Firefox: the same amount
    • Android: more
    • iOS: more
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • End-to-end tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Integration tests
    • Regression tests
    • Smoke tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Mobile – native Android app
    • Mobile – native iOS app

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: average
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: below average
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Healthcare Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise healthcare company is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We like the quick and easy implementation of automatic tests and the easy readability of automatic tests in terms of training new employees or maintaining existing tests. More complex tasks can be implemented by code. The modular structure of the records/test cases makes for easier implementation and maintenance.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: minor challenges
    • Staffing: minor challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: minor challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: major challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: slightly disagree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
    • Improved product quality: agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: the same amount
    • Web: less
    • Safari: less
    • Chrome: less
    • Edge: less
    • Firefox: less
    • Android: less
    • iOS: less
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • End-to-end tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Regression tests
    • Smoke tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – Delphi

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Professional Services Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise professional services company is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We like the ability to use C# for implementing additional functions and code modules.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: minor challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: slightly disagree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: slightly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
    • Improved product quality: agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: the same amount
    • Web: more
    • Chrome: more
    • Edge: more
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • End-to-end tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Integration tests
    • Regression tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Desktop – Delphi

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: average
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Insurance Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business insurance company is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Compatibility with Delphi is helpful.”

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • The price point of the product
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: disagree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: slightly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
    • Improved product quality: strongly agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: more
    • Web: more
    • Safari: the same amount
    • Chrome: more
    • Edge: the same amount
    • Firefox: the same amount
    • Android: the same amount
    • iOS: the same amount
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • Functional UI tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – Delphi

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: average
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: average
    • Cross platform testing: average
    • Cross browser testing: average
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business computer software company is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Shorter release cycles!”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • The price point of the product per user
    • The premium support option
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: no challenges
    • Staffing: minor challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: no challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: no challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: strongly agree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
    • Improved product quality: strongly agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: the same amount
    • Web: the same amount
    • Safari: less
    • Chrome: the same amount
    • Edge: the same amount
    • Firefox: less
    • Android: the same amount
    • iOS: the same amount
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • Database tests
    • End-to-end tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Integration tests
    • Performance tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Desktop – C/C++

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining the object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: superior
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: superior
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Kbc Advanced Technologies Plc

Introduction

This case study of KBC Advanced Technologies plc is based on an October 2023 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Ranorex Spy provides me answers on if the object is recognizable or if I need a workaround.”

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • The compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • The price point of the product
  • The challenges they had in testing their application before using Ranorex:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Staffing: major challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: major challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of defects in production: major challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: major challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The impact of using Ranorex Studio for test automation on their company:
    • Provided more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Impacted involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Identified gaps in the testing process: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
    • Improved product quality: agree
  • The types of applications/platforms/browsers they plan to use about the same, less, or more with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop: the same amount
    • Web: the same amount
    • Safari: less
    • Chrome: the same amount
    • Edge: the same amount
    • Firefox: less
    • Android: the same amount
    • iOS: the same amount
  • The automation needs they will have based on future projects and their roadmap:
    • Database tests
    • End-to-end tests
    • Functional UI tests
    • Integration tests
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API tests
    • Smoke tests
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – C/C++

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Object recognition: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: superior
    • Code editor: superior
    • Cross platform testing: superior
    • Cross browser testing: superior
    • Remote testing: superior
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better



More Research on Ranorex