TechValidate Research on Ranorex

177 Case Studies – Page 2 of 6


Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Real Estate Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise real estate company is based on a March 2024 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Great product and great support.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: highly satisfied

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: highly satisfied

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: highly satisfied
  • Their product experience:
    • Enabled productivity
    • Been reliable
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 36-50%
    • Increased product quality: 36-50%
    • Increased product revenue: 36-50%
    • Reduced testing costs: 36-50%
    • Reduced development time to market: 36-50%
    • Reduced manual testing: 36-50%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 36-50%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 36-50%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
    • Respectful
    • Caring
    • Saving time
    • Effective
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: highly satisfied

Ranorex Case Study

Vesit

Introduction

This case study of VESIT is based on a February 2024 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“User friendly tool and easy to use.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • product strategy: delighted
    • rate of improvement: delighted

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: delighted

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: delighted
  • Their product experience:
    • Been performance enhancing
    • Included unique features
    • Enabled productivity
    • Been reliable
    • Been security protected
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 50+%
    • Increased product quality: 50+%
    • Increased product revenue: 50+%
    • Reduced testing costs: 50+%
    • Reduced development time to market: 50+%
    • Reduced manual testing: 50+%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 50+%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 50+%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
    • Respectful
    • Caring
    • Saving time
    • Effective
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: delighted

Ranorex Case Study

Dorma + Kaba Holding Gmbh + Co Kgaa

Introduction

This case study of DORMA + KABA HOLDING GMBH + CO KGAA is based on a February 2024 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Very good object recognition. Freedom to program in c# as much as I want.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: delighted
    • Rate of improvement: highly satisfied

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: highly satisfied

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: delighted
  • Their product experience:
    • Been performance enhancing
    • Included unique features
    • Enabled productivity
    • Been reliable
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 50+%
    • Increased product quality: 36-50%
    • Increased product revenue: 36-50%
    • Reduced testing costs: 21-35%
    • Reduced development time to market: 36-50%
    • reduced manual testing: 50+%
    • reduced tester fatigue: 50+%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 36-50%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
    • Saving time
    • Effective
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: highly satisfied

Ranorex Case Study

Federal Government

Introduction

This case study of a federal government is based on a February 2024 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled organization asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled organization to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: almost satisfied
    • Rate of improvement: almost satisfied

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed organization uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: highly satisfied

Results

The surveyed organization achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: highly satisfied
  • Their product experience:
    • Been performance enhancing
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 50+%
    • Increased product quality: 50+%
    • Increased product revenue: 50+%
    • Reduced testing costs: 50+%
    • Reduced development time to market: 50+%
    • Reduced manual testing: 50+%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 50+%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 50+%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: highly satisfied

Ranorex Case Study

Large Enterprise Industrial Manufacturing Company

Introduction

This case study of a large enterprise industrial manufacturing company is based on a February 2024 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: highly satisfied
    • Rate of improvement: highly satisfied

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: highly satisfied

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: highly satisfied
  • Their product experience:
    • Been performance enhancing
    • Included unique features
    • Enabled productivity
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 10-20%
    • Increased product quality: 10-20%
    • Increased product revenue: 10-20%
    • Reduced testing costs: 10-20%
    • Reduced development time to market: 10-20%
    • Reduced manual testing: 10-20%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 10-20%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 10-20%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
    • Respectful
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: almost satisfied

Ranorex Case Study

Amr Corporation

Introduction

This case study of AMR Corporation is based on a February 2024 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Friendly user interface and easy hands-on process.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with the following:
    • Product strategy: highly satisfied
    • Rate of improvement: delighted

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s test planning: delighted

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of satisfaction with Ranorex’s quality of features: delighted
  • Their product experience:
    • Been performance enhancing
    • Included unique features
    • Enabled productivity
    • Been reliable
    • Been security protected
  • How using Ranorex Studio for test automation has impacted their company:
    • Increased tester productivity: 50+%
    • Increased product quality: 50+%
    • Increased product revenue: 50+%
    • Reduced testing costs: 50+%
    • Reduced development time to market: 50+%
    • Reduced manual testing: 50+%
    • Reduced tester fatigue: 50+%
    • Reduced developer time used for testing: 50+%
  • Their service experience:
    • Efficient
    • Respectful
    • Caring
    • Saving time
    • Effective
  • The satisfaction level of analytics and reporting: delighted

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business computer software company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – WPF
    • Mobile – native iOS app
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 60% automated, 40% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Integration
    • Performance
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Healthcare Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business healthcare company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Generally wanted the possibility of UI-Test-Automation. We did not do that before.”

“Seems to be the best available for desktop applications.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • Price point of the product
    • Price point of the product per user
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – C#
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 50% automated, 50% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: slightly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: disagree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise computer software company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We needed some tools for integrations desktop and web application testing. After a lot of research, Ranorex Studio was our choice, and we weren’t disappointed.”

“Quite easy to learn with a lot of possibilities, but some of the specific solutions need way too much workaround.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: minor challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: no challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: no challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Winforms
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 60% automated, 40% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Database
    • End-to-end
    • Integration
    • Performance
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: disagree
    • Shortened test cycles: disagree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: slightly agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly disagree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: slightly disagree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: superior
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: superior
    • Cross browser testing: superior
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: superior

Ranorex Case Study

Busy Lamp Inc

Introduction

This case study of BusyLamp Inc is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“The cross application feature and elements/path recognition are one of the standing points for us. Since we develop a browser app, the element recognition and identifying robust path is important for us, and from time to time we have to interact with Windows element and Ranorex does it without much hustle.”

“Overall I’m happy with Ranorex as a Test Automation tool. Having cross browser and native Windows support was important for us and Ranorex does it good and without much coding. I’m giving 8 points because Idera/Ranorex could improve in some areas, like saving the arrays/lists and accessing them in other recording/code modules and support should improve.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: minor challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • Staffing: minor challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: minor challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: no challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: minor challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Winforms
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 60% automated, 40% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly disagree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly disagree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: superior
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: superior
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise computer software company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Like the GUI object recognition using xPath which enables the product changes look and feel when software evolves while the test continues to run.”

“It is a good GUI testing tool with flexibility between allowing auto generated code for business oriented people and C# coding for software developers. The GUI object recognition is robust and easy to use.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: no challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: minor challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – C/C++
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: We have other in-house automated testing tools to make up our automated tests, which is the majority of our test and is more than 90%. Ranorex test is small part of our overall automated tests.
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Database
    • Functional UI
    • Integration
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API
    • Visual regression

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: disagree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: average
    • Cross platform testing: better

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Healthcare Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise healthcare company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: major challenges
    • Staffing: major challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: major challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: major challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 10% automated, 90% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Integration
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: slightly agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly disagree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business computer software company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Like the ability to create test regressions using image-based testing. Ease of installation, upgrades, and maintenance.”

“It’s fairly easy to use and maintain, and is a strong testing system.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Desktop – WPF
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 60% automated, 40% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: slightly agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: superior
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: superior
    • Cross browser testing: superior
    • Integrations with test management solutions: superior

Ranorex Case Study

Large Enterprise Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a large enterprise computer software company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Having an integrated framework which can identify Qt and web elements as well.”

“It’s a handy tool, but it would be better if it worked on MacOS, and if the Ranorex XPath could be more versatile and stable.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – C/C++
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 60% automated, 40% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly disagree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: average
    • Code editor: below average
    • Cross platform testing: below average
    • Cross browser testing: below average
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

State & Local Government

Introduction

This case study of a state & local government is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled organization asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled organization to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: minor challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: major challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed organization uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Java
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Desktop – WPF
    • Desktop – Delphi
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 25% automated, 75% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests
    • Smoke

Results

The surveyed organization achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: slightly agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: below average
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: average
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Healthcare Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise healthcare company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: minor challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Price point of the product per user
    • Premium support option
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: never got to automate our solution
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Database
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Performance

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: slightly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly disagree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: slightly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Transportation Services Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business transportation services company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“The application had got too big to do full regression testing manually before each customer release. With Ranorex, we can regression test an overnight build every day, which has meant that we are capturing regression issues much faster and more importantly before releases are built.”

“It’s pretty good for what I use it for (which is fairly limited as regards its potential), but there are some niggles that mean it takes time it shouldn’t from my day; almost certainly down to my misuse, but I am not techy enough to understand the ins and outs, and my tech colleagues don’t have time to get involved.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: major challenges
    • Staffing: major challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: major challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Price point of the product
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Question too technical for me really have selected what I think applies. I use it to test a proprietary transport application.
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 60% automated, 40% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: disagree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: strongly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business computer software company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“For me again it comes back to being able to use .NET / c# to adjust tests and base classes to work with multiple UIs.”

“Ranorex uses .NET back-end so it makes sense as that is what I used for development.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: no challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: minor challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: minor challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – WPF
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 75%+ automated, remaining manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Integration
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Construction Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business construction company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Now we can shorten the release cycles due to having good confidence in the quality of the software.”

“It’s a fast tool to automate (via capture/replay) but this can only be the first step on the way to robust and maintainable tests.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: major challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: minor challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: minor challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: minor challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: major challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: major challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – C#
    • Mobile – native iOS app
    • kendo – JavaScript UI Components
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 40% automated, 60% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly disagree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: strongly agree
    • Increased revenue: agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: strongly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: superior
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business computer software company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We appreciate the ease of use.”

“Good product. It would have been 10 but not everyone needs automated testing.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: no challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: no challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: major challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: major challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • Price point of the product
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – WPF
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 50% automated, 50% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Regression tests
    • Visual regression
    • Smoke

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: strongly agree
    • Increased revenue: disagree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: strongly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: average
    • Cross platform testing: average
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: average
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Engineering Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business engineering company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Helpful for remote testing.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: average challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Relationship and communication with the Account Manager and Sales Engineer
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
    • Price point of the product per user
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – .NET or VP.NET
    • Desktop – Winforms
    • Desktop – WPF
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 25% automated, 75% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Database
    • Functional UI
    • Integration
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API
    • Smoke

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: slightly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: slightly agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: slightly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Large Enterprise Industrial Manufacturing Company

Introduction

This case study of a large enterprise industrial manufacturing company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We love the object recognition capabilities.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • The object recognition capability
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – WPF
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 75%+ automated, remaining manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Functional UI

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Large Enterprise Computer Software Company

Introduction

This case study of a large enterprise computer software company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: no challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: minor challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: minor challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: minor challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – C/C++
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 75% automated, 25% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Performance
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly disagree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: average
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Brainbits GmbH

Introduction

This case study of brainbits GmbH is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Easy to use object recognition makes it so we can create easy test cases in a short amount of time.”

“Easy to use for non-techs and also powerful for experts!”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: minor challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • Staffing: minor challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 50% automated, 50% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests
    • Smoke

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: slightly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly disagree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: disagree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: disagree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: superior
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: average
    • Cross browser testing: below average
    • Remote testing: below average
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Large Enterprise Industrial Manufacturing Company

Introduction

This case study of a large enterprise industrial manufacturing company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: major challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: no challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: minor challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: minor challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 50% automated, 50% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: slightly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: slightly disagree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: slightly agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly disagree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: slightly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly disagree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: average
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: average
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Kubra Data Transfer Ltd.

Introduction

This case study of Kubra Data Transfer Ltd. is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

“We use the reporting and the server client features.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: minor challenges
    • Test reporting: no challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: no challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: no challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: no challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: no challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: no challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Web app
    • Mobile – native Android app
    • Mobile – native iOS app
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 50% automated, 50% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests
    • Web service/API

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: superior
    • Code editor: superior
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better

Ranorex Case Study

Promedico Ict

Introduction

This case study of Promedico ICT is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Ranorex seems to be the only tool with a minor effort to recognize UI Dataflex elements.”

“Ranorex is the best all-in tool!”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: minor challenges
    • Test reporting: minor challenges
    • Staffing: no challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: minor challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Price point of the product
    • Premium support option
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – Visual Dataflex
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 40% automated, 60% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Functional UI
    • Performance
    • Regression tests
    • Visual regression

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: strongly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: strongly agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: strongly agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: better
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Insurance Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business insurance company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Simple scripting, SQL data sources, conditions, and identification with automation IDs are just a few ways we use it. Our software is very complex and we have a few different variations of it. Test automation is not possible without the functions mentioned.”

“Best of all, it’s flexible and offers many possibilities to write tests, a repository for all objects used, etc. And they have good support.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: minor challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: major challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: average challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: minor challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: minor challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Relationship and communication with the Account Manager and Sales Engineer
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – C#
    • Desktop – WPF
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 40% automated, 60% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: slightly agree
    • Shortened test cycles: strongly agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly disagree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: slightly agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: superior
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: superior
    • Cross platform testing: superior
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: better

Ranorex Case Study

Small Business Consumer Services Company

Introduction

This case study of a small business consumer services company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“What do we appreciate about Ranorex Studio? The stability.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test coverage: major challenges
    • Test reporting: average challenges
    • Staffing: average challenges
    • UI object recognition and automation: average challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: minor challenges
    • Meeting the release schedule or deadline: major challenges
    • Unacceptable amount of bugs in production: major challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Price point of the product
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – C#
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 75%+ automated, remaining manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: agree
    • Increased revenue: slightly agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: slightly agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: superior
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: better
    • Code editor: better
    • Cross platform testing: better
    • Cross browser testing: superior
    • Remote testing: better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: average

Ranorex Case Study

Medium Enterprise Banking Company

Introduction

This case study of a medium enterprise banking company is based on a November 2022 survey of Ranorex customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“We have experienced a positive impact by using Ranorex Studio, however, I am not sure we have tapped into the full power of the product to discover other ways to implement it into our processes.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Ranorex:

  • Before using Ranorex, the challenges they had in testing their application:
    • Test reporting: major challenges
    • Flaky or unstable tests: average challenges
    • Getting feedback from testing: average challenges

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Ranorex that the surveyed company uses:

  • The most valuable aspects of Ranorex Studio in their decision to choose Ranorex over other vendors they evaluated:
    • Feature options that meet the needs of their team
    • Compatibility with current and planned organizational tools and solutions
  • The platforms/technologies they test with Ranorex Studio:
    • Desktop – Java
    • Desktop – C/C++
    • Desktop – Delphi
  • The percentage balance between automated and manual testing: 75% automated, 25% manual
  • The types of tests that are their priority for automation:
    • End-to-end
    • Functional UI
    • Regression tests

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Ranorex:

  • The level of agreement of how using Ranorex Studio for test automation impacted their company:
    • Increased testing productivity and efficiency: agree
    • Shortened test cycles: agree
    • Decreased number of manual test runs: agree
    • Improved application quality and fewer defects: strongly agree
    • Increased revenue: agree
    • Allowed for involvement by non-technical team members: agree
    • Led to more robust and reliable automation: agree
    • Shortened release cycles: agree
  • The rating of Ranorex Studio on the following capabilities compared to other solutions they have used or researched:
    • Objection recognition: significantly better
    • Ease for maintaining object repository: significantly better
    • No or low code testing with action editor and recorder: significantly better
    • Code editor: significantly better
    • Cross platform testing: significantly better
    • Cross browser testing: significantly better
    • Remote testing: significantly better
    • Integrations with test management solutions: significantly better



More Research on Ranorex