TechValidate Research on Research and Litigation Solutions

793 Case Studies – Page 26 of 27


Lexis Advance Case Study: Am Law 100 Firm

“Lexis Advance is more efficient than Lexis.com. It is an improvement.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 200 or more attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • WestlawNext®
    • WestlawClassic®
    • Bloomberg Law®
  • Practices the following areas of law most frequently:
    • Banking/Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Litigation
    • Real Estate

Results

  • Increased productivity by at least 25% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: Large Law Firm

“I especially like the ability of Lexis Advance to conduct research through the app on my iPad which makes me efficient outside of the office.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 100 to 199 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitor:
    • Access Law
  • Practices the following areas of law most frequently:
    • Construction/Real Estate/Building Management

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: extremely critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 25% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: Large Law Firm

“I use Lexis Advance specifically for the Colliers’ on Bankruptcy, which is a required resource in my practice area.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 100 to 199 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitor:
    • Bloomberg Law®
  • Practices the following areas of law most frequently:
    • Bankruptcy
    • Commercial/Contract

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 10% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: Large Enterprise Insurance Company

“While the platforms for Lexis Advance and WestlawNext are similar, I have found that Lexis Advance, particularly when combined with the Lexis for Microsoft Office, increased my speed to results.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 3-5 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • WestlawClassic®
    • Bloomberg Law®
  • Is primarily in the insurance industry.

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 10% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: Medium Enterprise Computer Software Company

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 6-10 attorneys.
  • Is primarily in the financial services industry.

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: State & Local Government

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenge with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency

Use Case

  • Has 6-10 attorneys.
  • Is primarily in the Financial Services industry.

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their organization: critical

Lexis Advance Case Study: Large Enterprise Insurance Company

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 11-20 attorneys.
  • Is primarily in the insurance industry.

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • their personal practice: critical
    • their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • breadth & strength of content: better

Lexis Advance Case Study: Large Enterprise Insurance Company

“Lexis Advance has simplified the research process. As a large title agent, we have the need to research a wide range of real estate, title and tax issues quickly and efficiently. Lexis Advance allows us to accomplish our goals.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 3-5 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitor:
    • WestlawClassic®
  • Is primarily in the insurance industry.

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: much better
    • Innovative features: much better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: Medium Enterprise Hospitality Company

“We are a small law department with limited resources in our legal budget. To the extent that our in-house lawyers can handle research and tasks that otherwise would go to outside counsel, Lexis Advance is a huge advantage in cost savings. I only wish Lexis Advance could add hours to the day.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency

Use Case

  • Has 1-2 attorneys.
  • Is primarily in the Hospitality industry.

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Increased productivity by at least 10% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 21 to 50 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenge with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content

Use Case

  • Has 21 to 50 attorneys.
  • Practices the following type of law most frequently:
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • their personal practice: highly critical
    • their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • ease of use: better
    • efficiency of search: better
    • relevance of results: better
    • breadth & strength of content: better
    • innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 25% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 6 to 10 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs
    • Need to manage risk

Use Case

  • Has 6 to 10 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Personal Injury
    • Product Liability

Results

  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better

Lexis Advance Case Study: 51 or more Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance has an easier interface than Westlaw.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs
    • Need to manage risk
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 51 or more attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Banking/Finance
    • Commercial/Contract
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • their personal practice: extremely critical
    • their organization: extremely critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • ease of use: better
    • efficiency of search: better
    • relevance of results: better
    • breadth & strength of content: better
    • innovative features: better

Lexis Advance Case Study: 11 to 20 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance allows immediate access to a legal research engine.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 11 to 20 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Insurance/Insurance Defense
    • Litigation
    • Personal Injury

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • their personal practice: highly critical
    • their organization: highly critical

Lexis Advance Case Study: Am Law 100 Firm

“Lexis Advance is the best search function available, although it still has some bugs that need to be addressed.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs
    • Need to manage risk
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 200 or more attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • WestlawNext®
    • WestlawClassic®
  • Practices the following areas of law most frequently:
    • Commercial/Contract
    • Insurance
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Product Liability

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • their personal practice: extremely critical
    • their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • ease of use: much better
    • efficiency of search: much better
    • relevance of results: much better
    • breadth & strength of content: better
    • innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 25% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: Large Law Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need to control research costs
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 51 to 99 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • WestlawClassic®
  • Practices the following areas of law most frequently:
    • Insurance

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: much better

Lexis Advance Case Study: Large Law Firm

“Lexis Advance enables me to work more meaningfully from outside the office.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs
    • Need to manage risk
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 51 to 99 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • WestlawNext®
    • WestlawClassic®
    • Bloomberg Law®
  • Practices the following areas of law most frequently:
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: extremely critical
    • Their organization: extremely critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: much better
    • Efficiency of search: much better
    • Relevance of results: much better
    • Breadth & strength of content: much better
    • Innovative features: much better

Lexis Advance Case Study: Large Law Firm

“Using Lexis Advance makes me more comfortable knowing that I have not missed a source when doing my research.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 200 or more attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • WestlawNext®
    • WestlawClassic®

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 10% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: Large Law Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenge with Lexis Advance:
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 51 to 99 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitor:
    • New Mexico One Source (New Mexico law)
  • Practices the following areas of law most frequently:
    • Commercial/Contract
    • Construction/Real Estate/Building Management
    • General Practice
    • Litigation
    • Tax

Results

  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Innovative features: better

Lexis Advance Case Study: Large Law Firm

“Lexis Advance provides streamlined and efficient research.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 200 or more attorneys.
  • Practices the following areas of law most frequently:
    • Insurance
    • Litigation
    • Tax

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: much better
    • Search efficiency: much better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: much better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

LexisNexis Public Records Case Study: Global 500 Pharmaceuticals Company

“We need the full legal name of companies when drafing contracts. If we didn’t have access to LexisNexis Public Records, that information would have to be obtained elsewhere, which would be more time consuming.”

Challenges

  • Subscribed to LexisNexis Public Records for the following reasons:
    • Offers the most accurate information available
    • Eliminates the need for multiple providers of public records information
    • Enables them to spend less time data gathering and more time analyzing/decision making
    • Integrates with legal, news and business research

Use Case

  • Selected LexisNexis over the following vendors:
    • Westlaw public records offerings, including Westlaw PeopleMap
  • Uses LexisNexis Public Records for the following tasks:
    • Find witnesses and parties to legal action
    • Find accurate legal names for businesses

Results

  • Is confident they’re searching the most comprehensive public records provider in the industry when using LexisNexis Public Records.
  • Trusts LexisNexis Public Records more than any other provider to investigate people and businesses.
  • Rated LexisNexis Public Records as highly differentiated or differentiated compared to the competition on the following attributes:
    • Connections between people, businesses, locations and assets
    • Depth and breadth of public records
    • Accuracy of search results
    • Completeness of search results
    • Timeliness of information

LexisNexis Public Records Case Study: Medium Enterprise Energy & Utilities Company

“I would really hate to not have access to LexisNexis Public Records. There would be a lot of owners who would most likely never be found.”

Challenges

  • Subscribed to LexisNexis Public Records for the following reasons:
    • Uncovers information that couldn’t be found otherwise
    • Connects people, businesses, locations and assets that other providers don’t
    • Offers the most accurate information available
    • Provides ability to look across all 50 states with one search
    • Eliminates the need for multiple providers of public records information
    • Mines over 36 billion public records
    • Provides necessary info in one comprehensive report
    • Enables less time data gathering and more time analyzing/decision making
    • Integrates with legal, news and business research

Use Case

  • Selected LexisNexis over the following options:
    • Google
    • White Pages/Yellow Pages
  • Uses LexisNexis Public Records for the following tasks:
    • Locate missing or hard-to-find people
    • Find a beneficiary
    • Locate associates, relatives and neighbors
    • Track ownership of assets

Results

  • Trusts LexisNexis Public Records more than any other provider to investigate people and businesses
  • Rated LexisNexis Public Records as highly differentiated compared to the competition on the following attributes:
    • Connections between people, businesses, locations and assets
    • Depth and breadth of public records
    • Accuracy of search results
    • Completeness of search results
    • Timeliness of information

LexisNexis Public Records Case Study: Medium Enterprise Health Care Company

“If we didn’t have access to LexisNexis Public Records, the impact to our organization would be an increased cost per transaction and higher risk on unvetted vendors.”

Challenges

  • Subscribed to LexisNexis Public Records for the following reasons:
    • Connects people, businesses, locations and assets that other providers don’t
    • Provides ability to look across all 50 states with one search
    • Eliminates the need for multiple providers of public records information
    • Provides necessary info in one comprehensive report

Use Case

  • Selected LexisNexis over the following vendors:
    • Westlaw public records offerings, including Westlaw PeopleMap
  • Uses LexisNexis Public Records for the following tasks:
    • Locate missing or hard-to-find people
    • Check for conflicts
    • Find a beneficiary
    • Vet potential vendors, business partners, or competitors
    • Track ownership of assets

Results

  • Is confident they’re searching the most comprehensive public records provider in the industry when using LexisNexis Public Records.
  • Trusts LexisNexis Public Records more than any other provider to investigate people and businesses for the following reasons:
    • Connections between people, businesses, locations and assets
    • Depth and breadth of public records data
    • Accuracy of search results
    • Completeness of search results

LexisNexis Public Records Case Study: Fortune 500 Health Care Company

“We use LexisNexis Public Records to ascertain ownership interests held by medical providers for the purposes of maintaining compliance with government contracts. Without it, I would not be able to perform basic functions of my job responsibilities related to reviewing provider networks.”

Challenges

  • Subscribed to LexisNexis Public Records for the following reasons:
    • Connects people, businesses, locations and assets that other providers don’t
    • Uncovers information that couldn’t be found otherwise
    • Provides ability to look across all 50 states with one search
    • Eliminates the need for multiple providers of public records information
    • Provides necessary info in one comprehensive report

Use Case

  • Uses LexisNexis Public Records for the following tasks:
    • Find witnesses and parties to legal action
    • Locate missing or hard-to-find people
    • Check for conflicts
    • Vet potential vendors, business partners, or competitors
    • Track ownership of assets

Results

  • LexisNexis Public Records is their most trusted source to investigate people and businesses.
  • Rated these LexisNexis Public Records attributes as highly differentiated compared to the competition:
    • Connections between people, businesses, locations and assets
    • Depth and breadth of public records
    • Accuracy of search results
    • Completeness of search results
    • Timeliness of information
  • Is confident they’re searching the most comprehensive public records provider in the industry when using LexisNexis Public Records.

Shepard’s Case Study: Am Law 100 Firm

“Shepard’s is often the quickest and least expensive way for me to (1) determine whether my adversary has properly summarized controlling law or avoided contrary authority; and (2) find the most recent and most persuasive cases on point.”

“I routinely Shepardize the cases cited by my adversaries in a brief or motion to identify contrary precedent and flaws in their arguments.”

Challenges

  • Solves the following challenges with Shepard’s:
    • Knowing that authorities are still good law
    • Improving productivity by streamlining & expediting research
    • Finding additional authority to bolster arguments
    • Reducing research costs

Use Case

  • Am Law 100 firm with 200 or more attorneys
  • Uses Shepard’s in the following ways:
    • To ensure that cases & authorities are still good law
    • To help formulate stronger arguments
    • To find more sources to clarify the law & support cases
    • To save time on research and validation

Results

  • Shepard’s is differentiated from other citators in the following ways:
    • Speed and performance in finding authorities relevant to research
    • Trust and reliability
    • Ease of use
  • Feels that the value of Shepard’s to their research provides a high ROI.
  • Highly dependent on Shepard’s to validate and research cases.

Shepard’s Case Study: General Counsel, Real Estate Company

“Shepard’s allows me to conclude that I have fulfilled my professional responsibility in fully researching a legal issue.”

Challenges

  • Solves the following challenges with Shepard’s:
    • Knowing that authorities are still good law
    • Finding additional authority to bolster arguments
    • Ensuring pertinent legal info isn’t missing that could hurt cases
    • Avoiding costly mistakes

Use Case

  • Corporate legal department with one attorney
  • Uses Shepard’s in the following ways:
    • To ensure that cases & authorities are still good law
    • To find more sources to clarify the law & support cases
    • To save time on research and validation

Results

  • Shepard’s is differentiated from other citators in the following ways:
    • Total history & treatment analysis including both positive and negative treatments
  • Feels that the value of Shepard’s to their research provides positive ROI.
  • Extremely dependent on Shepard’s to validate and research cases.

Shepard’s Case Study: State Court

“I constantly use Shepard’s to research the law, Shepardize cases, check accuracy of motion paper’s citation to cases – in essence to teach me what the law is and what law is applicable to the facts before me.”

“I use Shepard’s to check what I have written and what the litigators have written. For a specific example, most recently it was helpful in explicating the “zone of danger” exception when assessing the validity of a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress."

Challenges

  • Solves the following challenges with Shepard’s:
    • Knowing that authorities are still good law
    • Improving productivity by streamlining & expediting research
    • Finding additional authority to bolster arguments
    • Avoiding costly mistakes

Use Case

  • Uses Shepard’s in the following ways:
    • To ensure that cases & authorities are still good law
    • To help formulate stronger arguments
    • To identify any splits in authority and the impact cases
    • To find more sources to clarify the law & support cases
    • Build support for cases
    • Find positive and negative analysis

Results

  • Shepard’s is differentiated from other citators in the following ways:
    • Ability to identify a split in authority
    • Total history & treatment analysis including both positive and negative treatments
    • Speed and performance in finding authorities relevant to research
    • Trust and reliability
    • Ease of use
    • Accuracy
  • Feels that the value of Shepard’s to their research provides extremely high ROI.
  • Extremely dependent on Shepard’s to validate and research cases.

Shepard’s Case Study: Federal Government Attorney

“Shepard’s dramatically reduces the time required to ensure that the cases I am citing are good law. It also is a valuable tool for locating cases or other authorities to support my arguments.”

“For example, I found a case which stood for a general principle that supported my argument, however the facts of the case were rather different from those of my case. I was able to use Shepard’s to locate a case that had more similar facts.”

Challenges

  • Solves the following challenges with Shepard’s:
    • Knowing that authorities are still good law
    • Improving productivity by streamlining & expediting research
    • Finding additional authority to bolster arguments
    • Ensuring pertinent legal info isn’t missing that could hurt cases

Use Case

  • Uses Shepard’s in the following ways:
    • To ensure that cases & authorities are still good law
    • To help formulate stronger arguments
    • To find more sources to clarify the law & support cases
    • Build support for cases
    • Access a broad number of sources to clarify the law
    • Save time on research and validation
  • Works in a federal government agency

Results

  • Shepard’s is differentiated from other citators in the following ways:
    • Ease of use
  • Feels that the value of Shepard’s to their research provides extremely high ROI.
  • Extremely dependent on Shepard’s to validate and research cases.

LexisNexis Public Records Case Study: 13-Attorney Specialized Law Firm

“LexisNexis Public Records allowed me to trace heirs to an estate where others had been searching for years in other databases and came up with nothing.”

Challenges

  • Subscribed to LexisNexis Public Records for the following reasons:
    • Connects people, businesses, locations and assets that other providers don’t
    • Offers the most accurate information available
    • Provides ability to look across all 50 states with one search
    • Provides necessary info in one comprehensive report

Use Case

  • Selected LexisNexis over the following options:
    • Westlaw public records offerings, including Westlaw PeopleMap
    • Government websites
    • Google
  • Uses LexisNexis Public Records for the following tasks:
    • Find witnesses and parties to legal action
    • Locate missing or hard-to-find people
    • Check for conflicts
    • Find a beneficiary
    • Locate associates, relatives and neighbors

Results

  • LexisNexis Public Records is their most trusted source most to investigate people and businesses.
  • Rated LexisNexis Public Records as highly differentiated compared to the competition on these attributes:
    • Connections between people, businesses, locations and assets
    • Depth and breadth of public records
    • Accuracy of search results
    • Completeness of search results
    • Timeliness of information
  • Is confident they’re searching the most comprehensive public records provider in the industry when using LexisNexis Public Records.

LexisNexis CourtLink Case Study: Five Attorney Law Firm

“Our firm brought in several new clients using LexisNexis CourtLink.”

Challenges

  • Solves the following challenges with CourtLink:
    • Finding new business opportunities
    • Accessing dockets and documents from federal and state courts in one search
    • Conducting research on cases

Use Case

  • Most commonly search for the following pieces of information in CourtLink:
    • Specific dockets
    • Documents (briefs, pleadings and motions)
    • General cases in my practice area
  • Uses the following CourtLink features most frequently:
    • Single Search
    • Alerts
  • Top reasons for using the CourtLink Alerts feature are the following:
    • New business development
    • To be up to speed about the latest litigation activity in my area of practice

Results

  • Pinpointed a new business opportunity in the last three months with CourtLink.

LexisNexis CourtLink Case Study: Large Law Firm

“I use courtlink more than I use Lexis.com. We pull a lot of dockets and documents. I love the single search feature and the post-search filters. I work in the library and I use CourtLink on behalf of attorneys. The interface is easy to use.”

Challenges

  • Solves the following challenges with CourtLink:
    • Accessing dockets and documents from Federal and State courts in one search.
    • Conducting research on cases, opposing counsel or judge.
    • Tracking activity and parties in ongoing cases.

Use Case

  • Most commonly search for the following pieces of information in CourtLink:
    • Specific dockets
    • Specific complaints
    • Documents (briefs, pleadings and motions)
  • Uses the following CourtLink features most frequently:
    • Single Search
    • Alerts
    • Tracks
  • Top reasons for using the CourtLink Alerts feature are the following:
    • New business development
    • To be up to speed about the latest litigation activity in my area of practice

Results

  • Ranked CourtLink as a 10 out of 10 in terms of how critical it is to their practice.



More Research on Research and Litigation Solutions