TechValidate Research on Research and Litigation Solutions

793 Case Studies – Page 17 of 27


Lexis Advance Case Study: 11 to 20 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 11 to 20 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: extremely critical
    • Their organization: extremely critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 6 to 10 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency

Use Case

  • Has 6 to 10 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Banking/Finance
    • Creditors’ rights

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: much better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: much better
  • Increased productivity by at least 10% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 11 to 20 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 11 to 20 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitor:
    • Bloomberg Law®
  • Practices the following type of law most frequently:
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: much better
    • Efficiency of search: much better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: much better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 21 to 50 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance’s tabbed results are helpful, plus easier searching, etc.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency

Use Case

  • Has 21 to 50 attorneys.
  • Practices the following type of law most frequently:
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 25% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 6-10 Attorney Firm (Insurance Def., Intellectual Property, etc.)

“I like that with Lexis Advance, more statistics and information are available about each search, including the level of court.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 6 to 10 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Insurance Defense
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: extremely critical
    • Their organization: extremely critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: much better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better

Lexis Advance Case Study: 21 to 50 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenge with Lexis Advance:
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 21 to 50 attorneys.
  • Practices the following type of law most frequently:
    • Insurance Defense

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Innovative features: better

Lexis Advance Case Study: 21 to 50 Attorney Firm (Labor & Employment)

“Being able to search several types of sources at once with Lexis Advance greatly improves efficiency and speed, and often leads to discovery of helpful results I might not necessarily have thought to specifically search for. Lexis Advance’s ability to save search results in folders for future reference saves both time and expense — you have quick and easy access to prior research so there’s no need to reinvent the wheel when that issue comes up again.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 21 to 50 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • WestlawNext®
    • WestlawClassic®
    • Casemaker, Fastlaw
  • Practices the following type of law most frequently:
    • Labor & Employment

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: much better
    • Efficiency of search: much better
    • Breadth & strength of content: much better
    • Innovative features: much better
  • Increased productivity by at least 10% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 2 to 5 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 2 to 5 attorneys.
  • Practices the following type of law most frequently:
    • Insurance

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 10% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 1 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 1 attorney.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Criminal
    • Family
    • General Practice
    • Litigation
    • Real Estate

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 2 to 5 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs
    • Need to manage risk

Use Case

  • Has 2 to 5 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Family
    • General Practice
    • Real Estate

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 10% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 6 to 10 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance provides efficient searches with relevant results.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency

Use Case

  • Has 6 to 10 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • WestlawClassic®
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Bankruptcy

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: much better
    • Relevance of results: much better
    • Breadth & strength of content: much better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 10% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 6 to 10 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance makes me more confident in my search results.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency

Use Case

  • Has 6 to 10 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 25% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 11 to 20 Attorney Firm (Consumer, Landlord-Tenant, Family, etc.)

“I find that Lexis Advance has made it easier to search case law.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Migrated to it presuming it will soon become the default.

Use Case

  • Has 11 to 20 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • Publicly available online resources including Purdon’s, which is hosted by Westlaw Classic but not searchable.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Bankruptcy
    • Family
    • General Practice
    • Consumer
    • Landlord-Tenant

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Innovative features: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Ease of use: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 25% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 6 to 10 Attorney Firm (Insurance)

“Lexis Advance’s ability to place information in folders makes it easier to organize research for future use.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency

Use Case

  • Has 6 to 10 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Insurance

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Innovative features: much better
  • Increased productivity by at least 25% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 2 to 5 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance provides quick research and efficient results.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 2 to 5 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • WestlawNext®
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Health/Healthcare
    • Litigation
    • Personal Injury

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 11 to 20 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 11 to 20 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Commercial/Contract
    • General Practice
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Innovative features: better

Lexis Advance Case Study: 6 to 10 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance makes searches more efficient and effective.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content

Use Case

  • Has 6 to 10 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitors:
    • WestlawNext®
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: extremely critical
    • Their organization: extremely critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 75% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 1 Attorney Firm (Criminal, Family, Personal Injury)

“Lexis Advance enables me to quickly and efficiently research cases for motion practice.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 1 attorney.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Criminal
    • Family
    • Personal Injury

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: extremely critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 75% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 1 Attorney Firm (Criminal, Family)

“Lexis Advance allows for easier categorization of cases between federal and state and easy linking to other citations.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 1 attorney.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Criminal
    • Family

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: extremely critical
    • Their organization: extremely critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: much better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: much better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 21 to 50 Attorney Firm (Local Government, Municipality, etc.)

“Lexis Advance provides up to date research in a fast, efficient manner.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency

Use Case

  • Has 21 to 50 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Real Estate
    • Local Government, Municipality

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 6 to 10 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenge with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency

Use Case

  • Has 6 to 10 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitor:
    • WestlawNext®
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Insurance Defense
    • Litigation
    • Personal Injury
    • medical malpractice, trial practice

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 25% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 2 to 5 Attorney Firm

“I like the folders in Lexis Advance, as that saves time and paper. I can easily access the information needed and also Shepardize the cases quickly. Previously, I had to save them on a computer, try to find the ones I wanted as I could not save them with notes on the computer (my documents doesn’t allow), and then have to look up each case again to see if it was still relevant/good law. The notes are great for this too as I can outline the sub-issue in a case within a folder.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone
    • Ability to save to folders so I can save time when I need to shepardize a case.

Use Case

  • Has 2 to 5 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitor:
    • WestlawClassic®
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Family

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Relevance of results: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 21 to 50 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance allows me to quickly find the answers I need.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency

Use Case

  • Has 21 to 50 attorneys.
  • Chose Lexis Advance over the following competitor:
    • WestlawClassic®
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Litigation
    • Real Estate

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: extremely critical
    • Their organization: extremely critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: much better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 2 to 5 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance provides easier search functions for litigation research.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content

Use Case

  • Has 2 to 5 attorneys.
  • Practices the following type of law most frequently:
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: extremely critical
    • Their organization: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: much better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: much better
    • Innovative features: much better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 1 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance provides focused research with relevant results.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs

Use Case

  • Has 1 attorney.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Criminal
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: much better
    • Relevance of results: much better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 2 to 5 Attorney Firm

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenge with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results

Use Case

  • Has 2 to 5 attorneys.
  • Practices the following type of law most frequently:
    • Labor & Employment

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: much better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 6 to 10 Attorney Firm

“The Lexis Advance interface is an improvement over the old interface; retrieved/printed documents are more readable.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone
    • Printouts are better

Use Case

  • Has 6 to 10 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Commercial/Contract
    • Health/Healthcare

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better

Lexis Advance Case Study: 21 to 50 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance enables me to search more like I search the Internet.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for mobility — to access research on a tablet or smartphone

Use Case

  • Has 21 to 50 attorneys.
  • Practices the following type of law most frequently:
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 10% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 2 to 5 Attorney Firm

“Lexis Advance allows for quick comprehensive searching and Shepardizing.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for greater search efficiency
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content

Use Case

  • Has 2 to 5 attorneys.
  • Practices the following type of law most frequently:
    • Litigation

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: highly critical
    • Their organization: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 50% using Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance Case Study: 6-10 Attorney Firm (Commercial/Contract, Litigation, Tax)

“Lexis Advance has been an excellent research tool.”

Challenges

  • Solved the following challenges with Lexis Advance:
    • Need for comprehensive & relevant results
    • Need for increased breadth and strength of content
    • Need to control research costs
    • Need to manage risk

Use Case

  • Has 6 to 10 attorneys.
  • Practices the following types of law most frequently:
    • Commercial/Contract
    • Litigation
    • Tax

Results

  • Rated Lexis Advance in terms of how critical it is:
    • Their personal practice: critical
  • Ranked the following Lexis Advance capabilities as compared to the competition:
    • Ease of use: much better
    • Efficiency of search: better
    • Relevance of results: better
    • Breadth & strength of content: better
    • Innovative features: better
  • Increased productivity by at least 25% using Lexis Advance



More Research on Research and Litigation Solutions