Kenna.VM Customer Research
What vulnerability management challenges were you experiencing that led you to implement the Kenna.VM (formerly Security Platform)?
| Too many vulnerabilities with no way to effectively prioritize |
|
|
| High volume of security data lacking context for decision making |
|
|
| No way to quantify or measure risk from vulnerabilities |
|
|
| Inefficiencies in vulnerability remediation |
|
|
| Other |
|
Kenna Security Customer Research
What criteria do you use to evaluate the success of your Kenna Security platform implementation?
| Kenna risk score reduction |
|
|
| Reduction in Mean Time To Remediate (MTTR) |
|
|
| Reduction in IT remediation time |
|
|
| Reduction in vulnerability investigation time |
|
|
| SLA Adherence |
|
|
| Reduction in reporting time |
|
Kenna Security Customer Research
What do you view as Kenna’s primary advantage(s) over other vulnerability management platforms?
| Kenna goes beyond basic risk scoring and tells me what I need to fix first |
|
|
| Kenna provides meaningful and actionable data for remediation (remediation intelligence) |
|
|
| Kenna provides awareness of how much risk is in our environment |
|
|
| Kenna is updated continuously with real-time information |
|
|
| Kenna aggregates data and reporting from multiple tools (vuln scanners, CMDB, discovery) |
|
|
| Kenna includes multiple threat intel feeds (eliminating the need for subscription) |
|
|
| Kenna's cloud platform scales elastically to virtually any organization size |
|
Kenna Security Customer Research
What criteria do you use to evaluate the success of your Kenna Security platform implementation?
| Kenna risk score reduction |
|
|
| Reduction in Mean Time To Remediate (MTTR) |
|
|
| Reduction in IT remediation time |
|
|
| Reduction in vulnerability investigation time |
|
|
| SLA Adherence |
|
|
| Reduction in reporting time |
|
Kenna Security Customer Research
Before Kenna vs. After Kenna: Have you seen a reduction in time spent on the following activities? (Security and IT team time combined)
| Over 75% | Over 50% | Over 25% | Over 10% | 0% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time spent on Vulnerability Investigation |
16% |
39% |
19% |
19% |
7% |
| Time spent on remediation |
12% |
32% |
24% |
15% |
17% |
| Time spent on reporting |
27% |
25% |
25% |
13% |
10% |
Kenna Security Customer Research
Please select the answer below that best describes your current engagement model between the Security and IT team:
| Security investigates and prioritizes vulnerabilities; IT remediates |
|
|
| Security investigates; Security and IT work together to prioritize; IT remediates |
|
|
| Security and IT work together to investigate and prioritize |
|
|
| Security investigates; IT prioritizes and remediates |
|
|
| IT investigates, prioritizes and remediates; Security handles reporting |
|
Kenna Security Customer Research
| Too many vulnerabilities with no way to effectively prioritize |
|
|
| High volume of security data lacking context for decision making |
|
|
| No way to quantify or measure risk from vulnerabilities |
|
|
| Inefficiencies in vulnerability remediation |
|
Kenna Security Customer Research
What Kenna Security Platform features were most important to you when evaluating competitive or alternative solutions?
| Data science-based risk scoring methodology |
|
|
| Integrated real-time global exploit intelligence |
|
|
| “Off the shelf” integrations with a wide range of security data sources |
|
|
| Predictive vulnerability modeling |
|
|
| Integrated remediation and ticketing |
|
Kenna Security Customer Research
What are the most important security challenges the Kenna Security Platform has helped you solve?
| Addressing vulnerabilities that pose the greatest risk to our environment |
|
|
| Quantifiable way to measure, reduce and report on risk |
|
|
| Increased efficiency of vulnerability remediation |
|
|
| Transforming security data into actionable intelligence |
|
