TechValidate Research on QIAGEN Digital Insights


QIAGEN Digital Insights Customer Research

Which of the following do you consider the biggest gap in the toolset of MGM?

Scalable phylogenetic analysis (large phylogenetic trees): 10%
Comparative phylogenetics (tree comparisons): 13%
Comparative (functional) metagenomics - analyze your sample in the context of many other samples and finding publications with similar profiles: 25%
Tools to infer phenotypes from genomic samples (e.g. predicting AMR, best growth medium for the given genotype or similar): 16%
Tools to infer observables from (functional) metagenomic samples (e.g. predicting the host health state, growth conditions of plants ...): 6%
Tools for building custom databases from private or public data: 13%
More elaborate visualizations, please specify: 3%
More dedicated reference databases, e.g. habitat specific taxonomic profiling databases or functional analysis databases: 7%
Other: 7%




About This Data

This data was sourced directly from verified users of QIAGEN Digital Insights by TechValidate.

TechValidate verifies the identity and organizational affiliation of all participants that contribute to published research data. When research participants so desire, we also guarantee their anonymity so that they may share information honestly and freely.

Respondent Details


More Research on QIAGEN Digital Insights