TechValidate Research on FleetLocate

112 Case Studies – Page 3 of 4


FleetLocate Case Study

Finfrock Industries Inc

Introduction

This case study of Finfrock Industries Inc is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“It allows us to have real-time visibility on were our trailers are, and determine how many trucks are needed to recover assets in a timely manner.”

“If you want to gain real-time visibility, automate reporting and data so it allows you and your team more time to focus on items like Safety. Use FleetLocate.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is scheduling jobs.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 20 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster

FleetLocate Case Study

Leachman Lumber

Introduction

This case study of Leachman lumber is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Between FleetLocate and our delivery dispatch software, we have reduced the amount of time scheduling and shortened delivery times as well as provided proof of delivery with GPS tracking. Take the guesswork out of dispatching . . . use FleetLocate.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is scheduling jobs.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Do more jobs in a week
    • Waste less time idling
    • Experience less vehicle/asset downtime

FleetLocate Case Study

Atlas Services

Introduction

This case study of Atlas Services is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Watch every move; we micromanage. Try it and you will see what we see.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is scheduling jobs.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 16-20 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Do more jobs in a week

FleetLocate Case Study

Counter Design

Introduction

This case study of Counter Design is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“All drivers are aware of Fleet Locate in their vehicles, Funny business is no longer a problem. Knowing when your drivers will arrive at their destination is key in all aspects of meeting customer expectations. The window of arrival is very small which always pleases customers.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is scheduling jobs.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Do more jobs in a week
    • Waste less time idling

FleetLocate Case Study

Tejas Distributors, Inc

Introduction

This case study of Tejas Distributors, Inc is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“They know we know when and where they are where they are suppose to be. Our drivers leave for the week, run their routes over a 5 state area, and return. If a driver is not moving, and we know their first location has already opened, we contact them by phone to get them rolling. If they are lost, we navigate them remotely. If they are broke down, we know where to send the tow. When traffic, flooding, road closures, etc. arise we can warn and reroute them before they get stuck. I could go on and on.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is managing driver behavior.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Do more jobs in a week
    • Waste less time idling
    • Experience less vehicle/asset downtime

FleetLocate Case Study

Outdoor Home Living

Introduction

This case study of Outdoor Home Living is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“We found trucks parked in places they were not supposed to be. Also with the idle time. Found some drivers sitting for 30 minutes or more.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is managing driver behavior.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 11-15 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Waste less time idling

FleetLocate Case Study

Dylanz Transport Llc

Introduction

This case study of Dylanz Transport LLC is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Prevents me from calling and distracting my drivers for their location. Invest in FleetLocate.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is fleet maintenance.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has led to bigger paychecks for their team

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Do more jobs in a week
    • Waste less time idling
    • Waste less time on paperwork
    • Experience less vehicle/asset downtime

FleetLocate Case Study

BH Trans, Inc.

Introduction

This case study of BH Trans, Inc. is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“We are able to see where our units are, what they have done, and how far they have traveled, and their down time. It allows us to have more accuracy!”

“Keeping track of your units should be less time, leaving open opportunities to focus on other aspects of the business.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is reporting (driver logs, regulations like FSMA or IFTA, record keeping).

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 20 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Do more jobs in a week
    • Waste less time idling
    • Waste less time on paperwork
    • Waste less time complying with regulations
    • Experience less vehicle/asset downtime

FleetLocate Case Study

TAKK Transportation

Introduction

This case study of TAKK Transportation is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“I can track and find a guy immediately and stopped wasted out of route miles and wasted time.”

“Fleetlocate helped me to track drivers and make better use of their time and the mileage. It stopped out of route running and adding miles to equipment. It makes it easier to track their time and logs and stay compliant.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is reporting (driver logs, regulations like FSMA or IFTA, record keeping).

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 16-20 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Waste less time on paperwork
    • Waste less time complying with regulations
    • They have learned to better manage their trip time.

FleetLocate Case Study

Tri City Van & Storage

Introduction

This case study of Tri City Van & Storage is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“It makes dispatch find the equipment faster and we are able to notify customers faster. Go with Spireon – they will help your workday go a lot easier.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is reporting (driver logs, regulations like FSMA or IFTA, record keeping).

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 11-15 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Do more jobs in a week
    • Waste less time idling
    • Waste less time on paperwork
    • Waste less time complying with regulations
    • Experience less vehicle/asset downtime

FleetLocate Case Study

Millers Towing And Recovery Tx

Introduction

This case study of Millers Towing and Recovery is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Can locate drivers within a fraction of the time versus without it and a lot less phone time when trying to reach them.”

“FleetLocate is worth the money when it comes to running and business and monitoring driver progression.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is managing driver behavior.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits
    • FleetLocate has led to bigger paychecks for their team

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Do more jobs in a week
    • Waste less time idling
    • Experience less vehicle/asset downtime

FleetLocate Case Study

Texas Concrete Enterprise Ready Mix Inc.

Introduction

This case study of Texas Concrete Enterprise Ready Mix Inc. is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“I can see the location of all trucks all the time. Start using FleetLocate service!”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is GPS tracking.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Waste less time idling

FleetLocate Case Study

Midway Towing Llc

Introduction

This case study of Midway Towing LLC is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“FleetLocate has helped very much. Get it; you will very surprised. It’s worth it.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is scheduling jobs.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has led to bigger paychecks for their team

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • after FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Do more jobs in a week
    • Waste less time idling

FleetLocate Case Study

Medina Recycling, Inc.

Introduction

This case study of Medina Recycling, Inc. is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“FleetLocate helps me know where every driver is, eliminates wasted trips, and helps drivers stay on tasks.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is managing driver behavior.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Waste less time idling
    • Experience less vehicle/asset downtime

FleetLocate Case Study

Pan American Express Inc.

Introduction

This case study of Pan American Express Inc. is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Fleetlocate has helped us have better Trailer Utilization and improve our trailer pools.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is Equipment utilization, Fleet purchasing, Detention time managing, Trailer pool Management.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 20 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Waste less time idling
    • Experience less vehicle/asset downtime

FleetLocate Case Study

Berrett Pest Control

Introduction

This case study of Berrett Pest Control is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Provides accurate info with map tracking. Checking start times and idle times has led to more jobs getting done and higher production.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is managing driver behavior.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has led to bigger paychecks for their team

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Do more jobs in a week

FleetLocate Case Study

Scobie Water Service, Inc. & Trucking

Introduction

This case study of Scobie Water Service, Inc. & Trucking is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“FleetLocate helps us know where everybody’s at. It makes drivers better because they know you’re watching.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is scheduling jobs.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 11-15 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Waste less time idling
    • Waste less time complying with regulations

FleetLocate Case Study

Honey Transport, Inc.

Introduction

This case study of Honey Transport, Inc. is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“We have audited our logs by hand for years and now we no longer have to do that. Helps you know your hours of service and teach your drivers how to plan their trips.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is reporting (driver logs, regulations like FSMA or IFTA, record keeping).

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits
    • FleetLocate has led to bigger paychecks for their team

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 20 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Waste less time on paperwork
    • Waste less time complying with regulations

FleetLocate Case Study

At Your Disposal

Introduction

This case study of At Your Disposal is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“After implementing FleetLocate, our driver time is down.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is reporting (driver logs, regulations like FSMA or IFTA, record keeping).

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 11-15 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Waste less time idling

FleetLocate Case Study

Pc Transportation, Inc.

Introduction

This case study of PC Transportation, Inc. (830954983) is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“I am able to track where each driver is and what they are doing at a particular moment. Advice to fleet managers? Invest in the tracking of their assets.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is managing driver behavior.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 16-20 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Do more jobs in a week

FleetLocate Case Study

Twin Oaks Inc.

Introduction

This case study of Twin Oaks Inc. is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“FleetLocate helps me monitor location, time spent at jobsite, and idle time.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is location and time spent there.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Waste less time idling

FleetLocate Case Study

Avi Foodsystems

Introduction

This case study of AVI Foodsystems is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“I like FleetLocate’s ease of use and one spot for everything. It helps you manage your time more efficiently.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is reporting (driver logs, regulations like FSMA or IFTA, record keeping).

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Waste less time complying with regulations

FleetLocate Case Study

Pinnacle Property Maintenance, LLC

Introduction

This case study of Pinnacle Property Maintenance, LLC is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Drivers know they are monitored, so there is less waste of time taking longer routes or idling on job sites. FleetLocate helps you plan your day to maximize efficiency.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is managing driver behavior.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Do more jobs in a week
    • Waste less time idling
    • Waste less time on paperwork

FleetLocate Case Study

Bio Clear Water Solutions

Introduction

This case study of Bio Clear Water Solutions is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“FleetLocate has helped us waste less time idling and control speeding issues.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is managing driver behavior.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 3-4 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Waste less time idling
    • Controlling speeding issues

FleetLocate Case Study

Trimark Adams Burch, Inc

Introduction

This case study of Trimark Adams Burch, Inc. is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“FleetLocate provides visibility and accountability. Let technology save you time.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is managing driver behavior.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 5-7 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Waste less time idling

FleetLocate Case Study

Star Supply

Introduction

This case study of Star Supply is based on a December 2018 survey of FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“FleetLocate helps me monitor drivers to make sure time is spent on only work related duties. It allows me to give customers ETA’s at an instant without spending time waiting for driver response.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select FleetLocate:

  • Biggest time killer FleetLocate has solved is managing driver behavior.

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Agrees FleetLocate has done the following:
    • FleetLocate has increased business/profits

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with FleetLocate:

  • Time per week spent monitoring and performing vehicle/trailer maintenance before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 6-10 hours
    • After FleetLocate: 1-5 hours
  • Time spent on communicating schedules or dispatching drivers every week before/after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 1-2 hours per week
  • Time spent on paperwork before/after FleetLocate:
  • Had the following idle/down time for their drivers/vehicles/assets before & after FleetLocate:
    • Before FleetLocate: more than 10 hours per week
    • After FleetLocate: 8-10 hours per week
  • FleetLocate has enabled their drivers to:
    • Get to jobs faster
    • Do more jobs in a week
    • Waste less time idling
    • Experience less vehicle/asset downtime

Spireon FleetLocate Case Study

Archer Daniels Midland Company

Introduction

This case study of Archer Daniels Midland Company is based on a March 2018 survey of Spireon FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Great experience in every area. Exceeded our expectations.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Spireon FleetLocate:

  • Adopted a trailer management solution to:
    • Manage their trailer pools more efficiently
  • Evaluated/replaced the following competitors before choosing FleetLocate:
    • SkyBitz
    • Blackberry

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Spireon FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Adopted the FleetLocate trailer management solution as their first experience with trailer tracking.

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Spireon FleetLocate:

  • Best things about Spireon FleetLocate trailer management:
    • Device reliability
    • Network coverage
    • Software reliability
    • Reporting capabilities
    • The number of features
    • Price
    • Support

Spireon FleetLocate Case Study

Big G Express

Introduction

This case study of Big G Express is based on a March 2018 survey of Spireon FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“We think that Spireon is a great value.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Spireon FleetLocate:

  • Adopted a trailer management solution to:
    • Manage their trailer pools more efficiently
    • Reduce detention time
    • Improve driver safety
  • Evaluated/replaced the following competitors before choosing FleetLocate:
    • SkyBitz
    • Omnitracs/Qualcomm

Use Case

The key feature and functionality of Spireon FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Adopted the FleetLocate trailer management solution as their first experience with trailer tracking.

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Spireon FleetLocate:

  • Best things about Spireon FleetLocate trailer management:
    • Reporting capabilities
    • The number of features
    • Price

Spireon FleetLocate Case Study

Pan American Express, Inc.

Introduction

This case study of Pan American Express, Inc. is based on a March 2018 survey of Spireon FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

“Great features; very helpful in our day-to-day ops.”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Spireon FleetLocate:

  • Adopted a trailer management solution to:
    • Route their trailer fleet more efficiently
    • Manage their trailer pools more efficiently
    • Reduce detention time
    • Recover lost/stolen assets
    • Improve driver safety
  • Evaluated/replaced the following competitors before choosing FleetLocate:
    • AT&T
    • Omnitracs/Qualcomm

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of Spireon FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Adopted the FleetLocate trailer management solution as their first experience with trailer tracking.

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Spireon FleetLocate:

  • Best things about Spireon FleetLocate trailer management:
    • Device reliability
    • Network coverage
    • Software reliability
    • The number of features
    • Price
    • Support

Spireon FleetLocate Case Study

Sharp Transportation

Introduction

This case study of Sharp Transportation is based on a March 2018 survey of Spireon FleetLocate customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Spireon FleetLocate:

  • Adopted a trailer management solution to:
    • Manage their trailer pools more efficiently
    • Reduce detention time
    • Recover lost/stolen assets
  • Evaluated/replaced the following competitor before choosing FleetLocate:
    • Orbcomm

Use Case

The key feature and functionality of Spireon FleetLocate that the surveyed company uses:

  • Adopted the FleetLocate trailer management solution as their first experience with trailer tracking.

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with Spireon FleetLocate:

  • Best things about Spireon FleetLocate trailer management:
    • Device reliability
    • Software reliability



More Research on FleetLocate