Menu

TechValidate Research on Elsevier Clinical Solutions

136 Charts – Page 1 of 5


Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

How much of an improvement in diagnostic accuracy have you seen with ExpertPath?

Significant: 35%
Moderate: 55%
Minimal: 10%

Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

I prefer ExpertPath for answers to my diagnostic questions more than:

Pathology Outlines
65%
MedScape Pathology Network
49%
Pathpedia
48%
Books & Journals
24%
Sub-specialty resources
13%
Google
65%
Other
2%

Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

I prefer ExpertPath for answers to my diagnostic questions more than:

Pathology Outlines
65%
MedScape Pathology Network
49%
Pathpedia
48%
Books & Journals
24%
Sub-specialty resources
13%
Google
65%
Other
2%

Elsevier Clinical Solutions Customer Research

I prefer STATdx for answers to my diagnostic questions more than:

Google
62%
Radiopaedia
48%
Books & journals
47%
RAD Base
37%
Sub-specialty resources
26%
Assistance from colleagues
16%

Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

How much of an improvement in diagnostic accuracy have you seen with ExpertPath?

Significant: 35%
Moderate: 55%
Minimal: 10%

Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

How satisfied are you with ExpertPath?

Very satisfied: 65%
Satisfied: 34%
Dissatisfied: 1%

Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

How effective do you find ExpertPath in providing high-quality, reliable content to support your diagnostic decisions?

Very effective: 46%
Effective: 54%
Ineffective: 0%

Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

How effective do you find ExpertPath in reducing diagnostic error?

Very effective: 26%
Effective: 72%
Ineffective: 2%

Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

How effective do you find ExpertPath to be in reducing the time it takes to make an accurate diagnosis?

Very effective: 35%
Effective: 62%
Ineffective: 3%

Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

What benefits have you experienced as a result of using ExpertPath?

It has helped me increase confidence in my diagnosis
76%
It has helped me increase the speed of diagnosis
63%
It has helped me reduce diagnostic errors
45%
It has helped me reduce unnecessary testing and overutilization of pathology resources
28%
It has helped me standardize pathology operations and oversight
14%
It has helped me improve patient outcomes
13%

Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

Why do you use ExpertPath?

Compare multiple diagnoses
80%
Explore expert differential lists
82%
Select the appropriate tests
45%
Teach students and residents
45%
Provide relevant prognostic and therapeutic information
38%
Prepare for a tumor board
33%

Elsevier ExpertPath Customer Research

What challenges were you experiencing that prompted you to choose ExpertPath?

Wasted time navigating through other sources
70%
Lack of quality image examples
59%
Unreliable information from other sources
29%
Running unnecessary tests
6%

Elsevier Clinical Solutions Customer Research

How much of an improvement in diagnostic accuracy have you seen with STATdx?

Significant: 31%
Moderate: 58%
Minimal: 11%

Elsevier Clinical Solutions Customer Research

What challenges were you experiencing that prompted you to choose STATdx?

Wasted time navigating through other sources
73%
Lack of quality image examples
49%
Unreliable information from other sources
29%
Facing incidental findings in cases
24%
Not having a relevant sub-specialist to consult
20%
Running unnecessary tests
3%

Elsevier Clinical Solutions Customer Research

How satisfied are you with STATdx?

Very satisfied: 57%
Satisfied: 39%
Dissatisfied: 4%

Elsevier Clinical Solutions Customer Research

How effective do you find STATdx in reducing the time it takes to make an accurate diagnosis?

Effective: 63%
Very effective: 31%
Ineffective: 6%

Elsevier Clinical Solutions Customer Research

What benefits have you experienced as a result of using STATdx?

It has helped me increase confidence in my diagnosis
89%
It has helped me reduce diagnostic errors
54%
It has helped me increase the speed of diagnosis
53%
It has helped me with incidental findings
49%
It has helped me improve report creation
45%
It has helped me improve patient outcomes
24%
It has helped me standardize radiology operations and oversight
11%

Elsevier Clinical Solutions Customer Research

I use STATdx to:

Explore expert differential lists
87%
Compare multiple diagnoses
81%
Find patient case examples
62%
Stay current with the changing radiology landscape
28%
Teach students and residents
21%
Read the latest journal articles with RADSearch
6%

Clinical Skills Customer Research

What results have you seen from using Clinical Skills?

Evidence-based best practices are reinforced at the point-of-care
71%
Met regulatory compliance requirements and achieved quality measures
61%
Decreased time spent retrieving information allowing clinicians to spend more time on patient care
48%
Reduced variability in care and improved care coordination
48%
Improved clinician onboarding speed and quality
39%
Reduced recruitment and retention costs by investing in education of existing clinicians
17%
Other
9%

Clinical Skills Customer Research

I use Clinical Skills to:

Assign skills and educational modules to clinicians
69%
Create eLearning modules for orientation or continuing education
63%
Customize content to reflect my organization's needs
63%
Electronically complete competency checklists
58%
Track and measure clinician competence
51%
Offer clinicians CE as part of their Skill activity
45%
Automatically assign remediation to clinicians who answers test questions incorrectly
23%
Require an acknowledgement of an announcement from clinician
21%
Other
9%

Clinical Skills Customer Research

What challenges would your organization have WITHOUT Clinical Skills?

Providing a trusted clinical resource for clinicians to reinforce evidence-based best practices
79%
Accessing clinical information at the point-of-care
69%
Standardizing the delivery of care
64%
Managing competency among clinicians and identifying learning gaps
61%
Customizing content to reflect organizational needs
49%
Offering Contact Hours to clinicians as part of a Skill activity
45%
Other
2%

Clinical Skills Customer Research

Save your nurses’ time and money with their CE requirements

Please indicate if you agree with the following statements below. “The addition of CE to Elsevier Clinical Skills has helped our nurses save time and money on meeting their requirements for:”

Yes No
license renewal

73%

27%

certification exam preparation

60%

40%

specialty recertification

61%

39%

professional development

91%

9%

Clinical Skills Customer Research

The value of integrating CE into your nurses’ competency workflow

On August 1st, Elsevier Clinical Skills became the only skills solution that awards contact hours to nurses as they learn procedures and demonstrate competency, moving continuing nursing education (CE) directly into the competency workflow at no additional cost. How valuable is the addition of CE to Clinical Skills? (5 stars being the highest)

50%
14%
15%
4%
7%
5%
1%
0%
3%
0%

Surgical Pathology Clinics Customer Research

Why do Clinicians read Surgical Pathology Clinics?

Keeps me up to date on the latest clinical advances in my field
95%
Gives me a deeper understanding of a particular topic
71%
Assists me in clinical decision-making
59%
Helps me save time
53%
Provides an effective teaching tool
34%
Assists me in innovating in my field
16%
Supports my research activities
12%

Surgical Pathology Clinics Customer Research

High Satisfaction with Surgical Pathology Clinics

Overall, how satisfied are you with your subscription to Surgical Pathology Clinics? [Select one]

Extremely satisfied: 38%
Very satisfied: 47%
Satisfied: 12%
Dissatisfied: 3%

Surgical Pathology Clinics Customer Research

Why do you read/use Surgical Pathology Clinics? [Select all that apply]

Keeps me up to date on the latest clinical advances in my field
97%
Gives me a deeper understanding of a particular topic
72%
Assists me in clinical decision-making
61%
Helps me save time
53%
Provides an effective teaching tool
28%
Assists me in innovating in my field
14%
Supports my research activities
14%

Surgical Pathology Clinics Customer Research

86% of Subscribers are Extremely or Very Satisfied with their Surgical Pathology subscription

Overall, how satisfied are you with your subscription to Surgical Pathology Clinics? [Select one]

Extremely satisfied: 44%
Very satisfied: 42%
Satisfied: 11%
Dissatisfied: 3%

Braunwald's Heart Disease Customer Research

If you have activated your pin code to access the enhanced digital version of this book, which 3 features have been the most beneficial to you?

Regular updates
67%
The ability to search inside the book
51%
Mobile device capabilities
46%
The ability to download and use the book offline
45%
Videos
44%
Enhanced images
41%
I have not activated my pin code
13%

Braunwald's Heart Disease Customer Research

If you have activated your pin code to access the enhanced digital version of this book, which 3 features have been the most beneficial to you?

Regular updates
67%
The ability to search inside the book
51%
Mobile device capabilities
46%
The ability to download and use the book offline
45%
Videos
44%
Enhanced images
41%
I have not activated my pin code
13%

the Atlas of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics Customer Research

How well does your subscription to Atlas of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics meet your clinical reference needs?

Extremely well
33%
Very well
60%
Well
7%
Not so well
0%



More Research on Elsevier Clinical Solutions