TechValidate Research on Broadcom BlazeMeter

These pages present data that TechValidate has sourced via direct research with verified customers and users of Broadcom BlazeMeter. TechValidate stands behind the authenticity of all published data. Learn more »



345 Customers Surveyed

2,391 Data Points Collected

185 Published TechFacts

13 Published Charts

33 Published Case Studies



Selected Research Highlights


BlazeMeter Customer Satisfaction Rating

A DevOps Architect at a Global 500 telecommunications services company would be very likely to recommend BlazeMeter for this reason:

Ease of use to configure.

BlazeMeter Case Study

Global 500 Banking Company

Introduction

This case study of a Global 500 banking company is based on a February 2020 survey of BlazeMeter customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“It is important for our teams to easily test “as-code” within their IDE.”

“Test creation and maintenance takes too much time.”

“It is important that testing tools are easy to use for all teams (e.g. testers and developers).”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select BlazeMeter:

  • Considering or moved off LoadRunner due to:
    • Complex cost models
  • Have the following issues holding them back when using LoadRunner:
    • Inability to run performance tests across multiple geographical locations

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of BlazeMeter that the surveyed company uses:

  • Said they are currently using LoadRunner.

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with BlazeMeter:

  • Were able to set up and start testing with BlazeMeter in over 1 week.

BlazeMeter Customer Research

When evaluating BlazeMeter, which other products did you consider?

Open Source Tools
72%
HPE LoadRunner/Performance Center
28%
Smartbear
28%
Tricentis - Flood.io
10%
Parasoft
7%

BlazeMeter Customer Statistic

100% of IT organizations who have moved off or considering moving off LoadRunner for it being unable to shift quality left, agree with the following statement:

“It is important that testing tools are easy to use for all teams (e.g. testers and developers).”

BlazeMeter Customer Research

LoadRunner customers held back by having to manage multiple tools for continuous testing

Highlights what they want in an integrated continuous testing platform

Performance Testing
94%
API Testing
67%
UI Functional Testing
67%
User Experience Testing
50%
Scriptless Testing
44%
Mock Services Testing
39%
Test Data On-Demand
39%

BlazeMeter Case Study

Large Enterprise Insurance Company

Introduction

This case study of a large enterprise insurance company is based on a February 2020 survey of BlazeMeter customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.

“Lack of integration in our testing tools is creating longer test cycles.”

“It is important for our teams to easily test “as-code” within their IDE.”

“Test creation and maintenance takes too much time.”

“It is important that testing tools are easy to use for all teams (e.g. testers and developers).”

Challenges

The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select BlazeMeter:

  • Considering or moved off LoadRunner due to:
    • Complex cost models
    • Poor integration with existing tools
  • Have the following issues holding them back when using LoadRunner:
    • The need for multiple tools for continuous testing

Use Case

The key features and functionalities of BlazeMeter that the surveyed company uses:

  • Said they are currently using LoadRunner.

Results

The surveyed company achieved the following results with BlazeMeter:

  • Were able to set up and start testing with BlazeMeter in less than 1 day.


More to Explore