TechValidate Research on Arista

17 Charts


Metamako Customer Research

Top Use Cases for Metamako

Multiplexing Connections (order entry)
56%
Tapping
54%
High Resolution Timestamping
53%
Tap Aggregation
52%
Data Broadcast/Market Data replication
46%

Metamako Customer Research

Metamako Use Cases

(other than latency reduction)

Tapping
65%
High Resolution Timestamping
41%
Deploy FPGA applications
30%
Connection Monitoring
29%
Tap Aggregation
29%

Metamako Customer Research

High performance networks need serious buffers.

What % of packet drops are acceptable in a data capture solution?

0%
81%
1% - 9%
19%

Metamako Customer Research

Simplify your network in 2017

Using the same device for Tapping, Aggregation, and Timestamping functions would:

Simplify the network
73%
Reduce costs
56%
Remove points of failure
35%
Makes no real difference
17%

Metamako Customer Research

Metamako Clients: 2017 Goals

Please prioritize the following relative to your organisation’s 2017 goals.

Critically Important - 1 2 3 4 Minimal Importance - 5

Latency reduction
Deterministic performance
Implement SDN strategy
FPGA implementation
Implement 25G, 40G, 100G
Data capture
Improve network monitoring
Devops integration/rollout

Metamako Customer Research

Diverse range of Packet Capture use-cases

What are your top use cases for Metamako devices?

Tapping
63%
Reconfigurable Patch Panel
53%
Multiplexing Connections (Order Entry)
50%
Connection Monitoring
47%
Media Converter
34%
Tap Aggregation
34%
Timestamping
34%
Test Lab
24%
Deploy custom written applications or FPGA code
21%
Circuit Breaker/Kill Switch
18%
Scalable Broadcast
18%
Failover
8%

Metamako Customer Research

Monitoring, Timestamping and Analytics represent a significant upside.

Which non- latency-reduction functions do you use Metamako for?

Tapping
72%
Monitoring
34%
Timestamping
32%
Network problem diagnosis
19%
Analytics
15%
We use it only for latency reduction
13%
Network security
2%
Risk management
2%

Metamako Customer Research

Metamako is well positioned to upgrade much of the most widely deployed packet capture technologies.

What technologies are currently deployed for packet capture?
(regardless of whether Metamako devices are used)

Layer 1 switches
68%
Optical taps
58%
SPAN ports
58%
Aggregation switches 
57%
Data capture cards (Endace, etc)
38%
Third party analytics (Corvil, Velocimetrics, etc)
15%
Data capture probes (Gigamon, cPacket, etc)
9%

Metamako Customer Research

Metamako is a technology leader in the top packet capture use cases.

Which functions are are part of your data capture environment?
(regardless of whether Metamako devices are used)

Latency measurement
80%
Timestamping
76%
Realtime network analytics
57%
Back testing
56%
Network problem diagnosis
52%
Compliance captures
50%
Risk management
28%
Security
11%
MIFID II Obligations
7%
Intrusion/Extrusion detection
4%
We do not use data capture
2%

Metamako Customer Research

Within twelve months, which of the following do you plan to implement as part of your network strategy?

10G Ethernet
47%
40G Ethernet
44%
No change planned
33%
25G Ethernet
20%
100G Ethernet
16%
Infiniband
5%

Metamako Customer Research

Tapping is the dominant Metamako data capture use case. Is timestamping the biggest opportunity?

Thinking specifically about your Metamako devices, which non- latency-reduction functions do you use Metamako for?

Tapping
72%
Monitoring
34%
Timestamping
32%
Network problem diagnosis
19%
Analytics
15%
We use it only for latency reduction
13%
Network security
2%
Risk management
2%

Metamako Customer Research

Latency measurement and timestamping are the top data capture use cases among Metamako customers.

Which functions are deployed in your data capture environment?
(regardless of whether Metamako devices are used)

Latency measurement
80%
Timestamping
76%
Realtime network analytics
57%
Back testing
56%
Network problem diagnosis
52%
Compliance captures
50%
Risk management
28%
Security
11%
MIFID II Obligations
7%
Intrusion / Extrusion detection
4%
We do not use data capture
2%

Metamako Customer Research

40G bandwidth is coming.

Within twelve months, which of the following do you plan to implement?

10G Ethernet
47%
40G Ethernet
44%
No change planned
33%
25G Ethernet
20%
100G Ethernet
16%
Infiniband
5%
Omnipath
0%

Metamako Customer Research

Determinism (fixed latency) is viewed as a critical aspect of latency reduction.

Prioritised importance of network device functions.

Critically Important - 1 2 3 4 Minimal Importance - 5

Latency reduction
Deterministic performance
Implement SDN strategy
FPGA implementation
Implement 25G, 40G, 100G
Data capture
Improve network monitoring
Devops integration/rollout

Metamako Use-cases

What are your top use cases for implementing Metamako devices?

Connection Monitoring
46%
Reconfigurable Patch Panel
54%
Media Converter
32%
Failover
5%
Circuit Breaker/Kill Switch
16%
Scalable Broadcast
19%
Tapping
65%
Timestamping
35%
Deploy custom written applications or FPGA code
22%
Test Lab
24%
Multiplexing Connections (Order Entry)
51%
Tap Aggregation
35%

Metamako use-cases

What are Metamako clients using their devices for?

Connection Monitoring
46%
Reconfigurable Patch Panel
54%
Media Converter
32%
Failover
5%
Circuit Breaker/Kill Switch
16%
Scalable Broadcast
19%
Tapping
65%
Timestamping
35%
Deploy custom written applications or FPGA code
22%
Test Lab
24%
Multiplexing Connections (Order Entry)
51%
Tap Aggregation
35%

Key Purchasing Drivers

What were the key drivers for purchasing Metamako devices?

Lower trading latency
98%
Reduce Costs
18%
Gain operational advantages
45%
Meet compliance regulations
15%
Consolidatation of multiple network devices
15%
Other
5%



More Research on Arista