Networking! Networking! Networking! See the value at Frost & Sullivan’s MindXchanges!
How would you rate the networking at the Frost & Sullivan Executive MindXchange?
111 Customers Surveyed
933 Data Points Collected
161 Published TechFacts
34 Published Charts
28 Published Case Studies
Frost & Sullivan Executive MindXchange Case Study
This case study of Vita-Mix Corp is based on a May 2017 survey of Frost & Sullivan Executive MindXchange customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service.
“If I could only go to one event a year, I would choose to participate in Frost & Sullivan’s Executive MindXchange.”
The business challenges that led the profiled company to evaluate and ultimately select Frost & Sullivan Executive MindXchange:
The key features and functionalities of Frost & Sullivan Executive MindXchange that the surveyed company uses:
The surveyed company achieved the following results with Frost & Sullivan Executive MindXchange:
This case study of a large enterprise professional services company is based on a April 2014 survey of Frost & Sullivan Executive MindXchange customers by TechValidate, a 3rd-party research service. The profiled company asked to have their name blinded to protect their confidentiality.
“It allows us to learn best practices from comparable companies in terms of customer ownership and strategy that we’ll be taking back.”
“We established strong relationships with numerous business leaders from the attendees and vendors. Thanks!”
Frost & Sullivan Executive MindXchange Customer Research
What are the problems that plague today’s “traditional” trade show and/or conference?
Bait & Switch: Content does not stay on point and speakers are not qualified to present on topic |
|
|
Content is a one-way push from the podium with little interaction or Q&A |
|
|
Presentations produce too few action items and takeaways - too theoretical |
|
|
Networking is limited & activities are dull and relationships are difficult to develop due to transient audience |
|
|
Aggressive sales tactics by sponsoring & exhibiting companies |
|
|
Lack of community amongst event participants |
|
|
Poor communication & customer service by organizers |
|
|
Audience is too junior |
|