Menu

TechValidate Research on PADS

These pages present data that TechValidate has sourced via direct research with verified customers and users of PADS. TechValidate stands behind the authenticity of all published data. Learn more »



2,253 Customers Surveyed

17,607 Data Points Collected

91 Published TechFacts

12 Published Charts

35 Published Case Studies



Selected Research Highlights


Research by TechValidate

Has HyperLynx helped you identify and solve signal integrity issues?

YES!”

Source:

R&D Manager, Large Enterprise Industrial Manufacturing Company

Research by TechValidate

Case Study: Furaxa Ultrafast Electronics

Challenges

  • Looking for a PCB design tool that ensures compliance with design constraints.

Use Case

  • Routes their PCBs 100% manually.
  • Relies on PADS’ real-time monitoring tools, such as the trace-length monitor and spreadsheet view, to ensure compliance with design constraints.

Results

  • Rates the following PADS capabilities as ‘superior’ compared to other PCB routing tools:
    1. Ease of use and setup
    2. Speed and efficiency
    3. Various user controls
  • Agrees that PADS helps him with tough designs such as highly constrained, RF, dense, etc.
  • Saves 1-2 hours per design with PADS design reuse.
  • Agrees that PADS design flow helps him reduce PCB prototypes.
  • Would choose PADS again.

Source:

Joel Libove, Owner/President, Furaxa Ultrafast Electronics

Research by TechValidate

PADS: PCB Design Done Right

“The integrated solution of schematic capture —> simulation —> layout —> simulation ensures the design will work the first time.”

Source:

Design Engineer, Large Enterprise Electronics Company

Research by TechValidate

Why You Should Include Signal Integrity Analysis in PCB Design

Top ways that PADS customers use HyperLynx signal integrity:

To define & capture high-speed constraints to drive layout
25%
To define & validate layer stackup
23%
To confirm termination strategy
21%
To aid in component selection
6%

Note: this is a multiple-choice question – response percentages may not add up to 100.

Source:

Survey of 248 PADS customers

Research by TechValidate

Faster PCB Layout with PADS

80% of surveyed customers say that PCB layout is faster with PADS than with competitive tools.

5% - 60% faster: 80%
< 5%: 20%

Source:

Survey of 358 PADS customers

Research by TechValidate

Case Study: Pharmaceuticals Company

Challenges

  • Chose PADS over other PCB design tools for its:
    • Ease of use
    • Simple learning curve
    • Proven performance
    • Quality of support
    • Better technology
    • Reputation as a market leader in desktop PCB design

Use Case

  • Uses Signal Integrity and PCB Layout in the PADS ES suite.

Results

  • Chose PADS over Allegro, Altium Designer, and OrCAD.
  • Became productive in PADS in 1-2 weeks.
  • Consistently releases products on time using PADS.
  • Describes PADS’ routing as being easier to use than competitive tools.
  • Says that PCB layout is 21-40% faster with PADS than with previous design tools.
  • Would recommend PADS to a friend.

Testimonials

“Design rule checks and netlist comparisons from the final layout to the schematic are hugely helpful. The nice thing about using PADS is that it’s very easy to run a trace while using rules and the software is very intuitive.”

Source:

TechValidate Survey of a Medium Enterprise Pharmaceuticals Company



More to Explore



About PADS

PADS®, Mentor Graphics’ desktop PCB design tool, enables development of PCBs within a highly productive, scalable, and easy-to-use environment.

  Mentor Graphics Website