HP Application Lifecycle Management ALM 12

Check what users have to say about the new HP ALM software



Research by TechValidate

A Global 500 telecommunications equipment company will improve their user adoption of HP ALM/QC 12 by 51-100% through the new UI features in HP ALM 12.

Source:

IT Specialist, Global 500 Telecommunications Equipment Company

Research by TechValidate

HP ALM/QC Customer Review

4/5 Stars

How our organization uses HP ALM/QC:

“We use HP Application Lifecycle Management in 40% of our projects and we are growing out use.”

Would you recommend HP ALM/QC?

“Yes. It is the best tool in the market.”

Source:

Application Manager, Global 500 Professional Services Company

Research by TechValidate

HP ALM/QC Customer Review

4/5 Stars

How our organization uses HP ALM/QC:

“We use HP ALM for all of our QA testing and defect reporting. We also use HP UFT for automation testing and have a team using HP Sprinter. We generate a reporting dashboard for upper management to gauge release readiness from QA activities.”

Would you recommend HP ALM/QC?

“Yes, it’s very stable, a lot of people involved in QA are familiar with it already, and for those who are not it is easy to learn. The companion tools such as UFT and Sprinter are the best out there.”

Source:

IT Systems Analyst, Fortune 500 Financial Services Company

Research by TechValidate

HP ALM/QC Customer Review

4.5/5 Stars

How our organization uses HP ALM/QC:

“We have projects with advanced customization and integration with other HP tools.”

Would you recommend HP ALM/QC?

“Yes I would Recommend HP ALM/QC because of its usefulness, timesaving and advantageous structure.”

Source:

IT Specialist, Global 500 Telecommunications Equipment Company

Research by TechValidate

“We know that the new ALM/QC features will make it easier to manage requirements.”

Source:

IT Specialist, Global 500 Insurance Company

Research by TechValidate

HP ALM/QC

“The new ALM will enable quicker and easier access to QA defect information since the new web client will already be on everyone’s desktop via a browser link.”

Source:

IT Systems Analyst, Fortune 500 Financial Services Company

Research by TechValidate

HP ALM/QC Customer Testimonial

“The new HP ALM will be at the center and will have the ability to connect any other application. We anticipate that it will broaden the usage of ALM in the company.”

Source:

Application Manager, Global 500 Professional Services Company

Research by TechValidate

“The new HP ALM/QC has good UI and dashboard. It is available on several browsers. Improved stability is observed in HP ALM 12.”

Source:

IT Specialist, Global 500 Telecommunications Equipment Company

Research by TechValidate

“The new ALM/QC will greatly improve our ability to roll out changes. The new requirements authoring module will also increase the capabilities of our group when writing requirements and the subsequent documentation we output.”

Source:

IT Manager, Global 500 Insurance Company

Research by TechValidate

Case Study: Global 500 Professional Services Company

Challenges

  • Addressed the following challenges with HP Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center (QC):
    • Application teams working in silos using disparate test and defect management processes
    • Lack of transparency and difficulty delivering meaningful quality metrics and KPIs
    • Difficulty of managing geographically distributed application teams
    • Inefficient use of test environments and testing resources
    • Inadequate visibility into the full application development lifecycle

Use Case

  • Uses the following HP ALM/QC modules:
    • Project Planning & Tracking
    • Release & Cycle Management
    • Requirements Management
    • Test Management (Test Plan & Test Lab)
    • Development Integrations
    • Reporting / Dashboards
  • Rated the following new features introduced in HP ALM/QC12 as most critical to their team & would drive them to upgrade:
    • Improved User Interface and navigation: Clean and intuitive design for ease of use
    • Availability over a number of web browsers
    • Single sign-on capability
  • Is planning to upgrade to HP ALM/QC12 within the next 6-12 months.

Results

  • Will improve user adoption of HP ALM/QC 12 by 11-25% through the new UI features in HP ALM 12.
  • Anticipates migrating to HP ALM from Quality Center Enterprise due to:
    • Project planning & tracking across distributed team
    • Requirements definition and management
    • Lab management
    • Reusable Assets for Requirements, Tests, and Defects
    • Integration with other HP and 3rd party tools for better collaboration
    • Application Lifecycle Intelligence (ALI)
  • Expects to manage 1-10% more projects using HP ALM/QC 12’s new features.
  • Will get the full value of the new features on HP ALM/QC12 in > one month.

Testimonials

ALM will be the center and will have the ability to connect with any applications; it will broaden the usage of ALM in the company. Connectivity is the key.”

Source:

TechValidate Survey of a Global 500 Professional Services Company

Research by TechValidate

Case Study: Global 500 Telecommunications Equipment Company

Challenges

  • Addressed the following challenges with HP Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center (QC):
    • Application teams working in silos using disparate test and defect management processes
    • Lack of transparency and difficulty delivering meaningful quality metrics and KPIs
    • Difficulty of managing geographically distributed application teams
    • Lack of standard planning and execution processes
    • Inefficient use of test environments and testing resources
    • Inadequate visibility into the full application development lifecycle
    • Data redundancy if using excel

Use Case

  • Uses the following HP ALM/QC modules:
    • Project Planning & Tracking
    • Release & Cycle Management
    • Requirements Management
    • Components (Business Process Testing)
    • Test Management (Test Plan & Test Lab)
    • Defect Management
    • Reporting / Dashboards
  • Rated the following new features introduced in HP ALM/QC12 as most critical to their team & would drive them to upgrade:
    • Improved User Interface and navigation: Clean and intuitive design for ease of use
    • Availability over a number of web browsers
    • Single sign-on capability
    • web Client

Results

  • Will improve user adoption of HP ALM/QC 12 by 51-100% through the new UI features in HP ALM 12.
  • Anticipates migrating to HP ALM from Quality Center Enterprise due to:
    • Cross-project reporting
    • Project planning & tracking across distributed team
    • Requirements definition and management
    • Shared customization/process enablement
    • Lab management
    • Reusable Assets for Requirements, Tests, and Defects
    • Integration with other HP and 3rd party tools for better collaboration
    • Business View Excel Reports
  • Expects to manage 51-100% more projects using HP ALM/QC 12’s new features.
  • Will get the full value of the new features on HP ALM/QC12 in > one month.

Testimonials

“The new ALM has a good UI, and dashboard and available for several browsers. Improved stability is observed in HP ALM 12.”

Source:

TechValidate Survey of a Global 500 Telecommunications Equipment Company

Research by TechValidate

Case Study: Fortune 500 Financial Services Company

Challenges

  • Addressed the following challenges with HP Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center (QC):
    • Difficulty of managing geographically distributed application teams
    • Inadequate visibility into the full application development lifecycle

Use Case

  • Uses the following HP ALM/QC modules:
    • Release & Cycle Management
    • Requirements Management
    • Test Management (Test Plan & Test Lab)
    • Defect Management
    • Reporting / Dashboards
  • Rated the following new features introduced in HP ALM/QC12 as most critical to their team & would drive them to upgrade:
    • easier access via web browser
  • Is planning to upgrade to HP ALM/QC12 within the next 6-12 months.

Results

  • Anticipates migrating to HP ALM from Quality Center Enterprise due to:
    • We’re already on ALM
  • Will get the full value of the new features on HP ALM/QC12 immediately after upgrade.

Testimonials

“The new ALM will enable quicker and easier access to QA defect information since the new web client will already be on everyone’s desktop via a browser link.”

Source:

TechValidate Survey of a Fortune 500 Financial Services Company

Research by TechValidate

HP ALM/QC Customer Statistic

60% of surveyed IT organizations rated improved User Interface and navigation: clean and intuitive design for ease of use as most critical to their team & would drive them to upgrade.

Source:

Survey of 10 users of HP Software Application Lifecycle Management

Research by TechValidate

Reasons to migrate from HP Quality Center to HPALM/QC12

Which of the following features and capabilities of HP ALM will make you likely to migrate from Quality Center Enterprise to ALM? (Select all that apply).

Cross-project reporting
60%
Project planning & tracking across distributed team
60%
Requirements definition and management
50%
Shared customization/process enablement
40%
7-Way traceability
20%
Test planning based on build health & risk
10%
High availability server
20%
Lab management
30%
Reusable Assets for Requirements, Tests, and Defects
60%
Integration with other HP and 3rd party tools for better collaboration
50%
Application Lifecycle Intelligence (ALI)
10%
Other
30%

Note: this is a multiple-choice question – response percentages may not add up to 100.

Source:

Survey of 10 users of HP Software Application Lifecycle Management

Research by TechValidate

Reasons to upgrade to HP ALM/QC12

Which of the following new features introduced in HP ALM/QC12 (that you tested) are the most critical to your team and would drive you to upgrade? (Select all that apply.)

Improved User Interface and navigation: Clean and intuitive design for ease of use
60%
Availability over a number of web browsers
50%
Single sign-on capability
40%
Mobile mini-application
10%
Access to run tests and enter defects on mobile devices such as tablets or smartphones
10%
Other
40%

Note: this is a multiple-choice question – response percentages may not add up to 100.

Source:

Survey of 10 users of HP Software Application Lifecycle Management

Research by TechValidate

Modules of ALM leveraged by users

What modules of HP ALM/QC does your organization use? (Select all that apply.)

Project Planning & Tracking
30%
Release & Cycle Management
90%
Requirements Management
100%
Components (Business Process Testing)
10%
Risk Based Quality Management
10%
Test Management (Test Plan & Test Lab)
100%
Sprinter
20%
Defect Management
90%
Development Integrations
10%
Reporting / Dashboards
100%

Note: this is a multiple-choice question – response percentages may not add up to 100.

Source:

Survey of 10 users of HP Software Application Lifecycle Management

Research by TechValidate

Challenges addressed by HP ALM solution

Which of the following challenges does HP Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center (QC) help you address? (Select all that apply.)

Application teams working in silos using disparate test and defect management processes
80%
Lack of transparency and difficulty delivering meaningful quality metrics and KPIs
50%
Unclear or untestable requirements
20%
Difficulty of managing geographically distributed application teams
70%
Lack of standard planning and execution processes
20%
Inefficient use of test environments and testing resources
20%
Inadequate visibility into the full application development lifecycle
60%
Other
10%

Note: this is a multiple-choice question – response percentages may not add up to 100.

Source:

Survey of 10 users of HP Software Application Lifecycle Management



More Research on HP Software Application Lifecycle Management